Yup. The Caps could have easily kept him in contract purgatory if they wanted.I was more intrigued that the Caps let him out of his contract to stay in division than his resignation.
The raise wouldn't keep him even remotely on pace with the ballooning of top coaches salaries since he signed his original contract, though. While he would have been paid more than some of the lower profile guys like Travis Green and Bob Boughner, he would have been making a fraction of what Claude Julien, Joel Queneville, and Todd McLellan make (let alone Babcock's ubercontract). He would have even been making less than the NCAA hires like Dave Hakstol and David Quinn.
Coaches - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
They won a Cup. Unless they completely collapsed he was absolutely NOT getting fired. This is totally made up.It wasnt just about the money. The writing was on the wall. If Trotz decided to stay here, he was going to get fired. Do you guys not get it?
My implication wasn't intended to be that the Caps did anything wrong, but rather than Trotz was justified in thinking he should get paid more for his accomplishments.Yeah, I knew that. But it was a raise, negotiated in good faith on the basis of winning a Cup. That the market moved in the interim isn't GMBM or the franchise's fault and so shouldn't factor into the evaluation of how they handled Trotz this offseason. I really don't see where they did anything wrong.
They won a Cup. Unless they completely collapsed he was absolutely NOT getting fired. This is totally made up.
Agreed. And they let him out of that deal because that ultimately was the outcome that everyone wanted. Trotz gets his big payday and BMac got his preferred HC.My implication wasn't intended to be that the Caps did anything wrong, but rather than Trotz was justified in thinking he should get paid more for his accomplishments.
My implication wasn't intended to be that the Caps did anything wrong, but rather than Trotz was justified in thinking he should get paid more for his accomplishments.
Trotz was entirely within his rights to think he was worth more as a coach (and the Islanders would eventually prove him right on that front). The Capitals were also entirely within their right to not be willing to pay a coach that much, and even went so far as to release him from his contract rather than turn the situation into an ugly contract dispute.
It wasnt just about the money. The writing was on the wall. If Trotz decided to stay here, he was going to get fired. Do you guys not get it?