You'd think there are more urgent needs than Paquette to be addressed.
Sometimes I feel like Bergevin is going through the list of players, and just goes after the ones he "likes" no matter the fit and the team's needs are.
We need depth players to fill out the roster regardless. Paquette for under 1mil doesn't prevent us from signing any other player. Might have just been an easy negotiation and a good fit.
Stop. Do players get targeted for their Democrat beliefs? Liberal beliefs? Conservative beliefs? Nothing wrong having Republican beliefs (half of United states electorate). Lets stick to hockey, and keep politics out of this. I could not care less for who a hockey player votes, as long as he plays hockey, is a team player.Imagine Deangelo come in and form a friendship with Poehling (a kid who took heat for his Republican beliefs).
I get your low risk point but Deangelo's been an asshole bully since he was in Junior and has shown no signs of growing up. I don't want his negative influence on any Habs players even for one day.
Not to mention, he's brutal defensively.
You'd think there are more urgent needs than Paquette to be addressed.
Sometimes I feel like Bergevin is going through the list of players, and just goes after the ones he "likes" no matter the fit and the team's needs are.
You would think fans would chill at using $1M and under contracts as a major negative towards Bergevin. Do you seriously think that all signings need to be done in order of cap hit and priority? Because we signed a guy at $1M and under, it was our prime focus? We can't work on several things at once?
Stop. Do players get targeted for their Democrat beliefs? Liberal beliefs? Conservative beliefs? Nothing wrong having Republican beliefs (half of United states electorate). Lets stick to hockey, and keep politics out of this. I could not care less for who a hockey player votes, as long as he plays hockey, is a team player.
Who's the source for Paquette? What's the word on the player for anyone who has watched him more than me?
Who's the source for Paquette? What's the word on the player for anyone who has watched him more than me?
Yup. You need depth players. You do.
But we also need a top-9 C, a top-9 W, 2 RHDs and likely re-signing Perry, Kotkaniemi and Lehkonen. NOW might be the time to get things going... You can't fill all those needs in one day.
You would think fans would chill at using $1M and under contracts as a major negative towards Bergevin. Do you seriously think that all signings need to be done in order of cap hit and priority? Because we signed a guy at $1M and under, it was our prime focus? We can't work on several things at once?
Who's the source for Paquette? What's the word on the player for anyone who has watched him more than me?
Paquette is a good 13th forward to have around given he can play centre or wing, zero issues if we sign him for under a million.
Id rather have Paquette then a guy like Staal. Every team has to have a few depth guys that can slot in and out of the lineup. Id be okay with Bergevin doing this.