Toggle sidebar

Trade, FA, Rumour Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
TheJadePipe

TheJadePipe

Registered User
Mar 8, 2016
1,094
858
Jetsfan79 said:
I was referencing the poster who said we should trade him in a heartbeat if we can get Armia. Which feeds the feeling of some here implying Stastny is not that good anymore. Which I disagree with.
Click to expand...
I am that poster and I said trade Copp in a heartbeat for Armia not Stats
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hobby Bull

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
13,943
11,781
BlakeScheifehlaine said:
Domi? I guess if it's pay copp 5 or trade him then I suppose I'd probably do that deal if cbj retains but it probably wouldn't be my first or ideal option. That one is in Vancouver now..

I wonder if Konecny wouldn't fit better.
Click to expand...
He'd be an ideal RWer if you ask me.
Would Copper, Heinola and Chisholm be enough.
 
JetsFan815

JetsFan815

Registered User
Jan 16, 2012
19,252
24,462
Domi has not been good I watched him when I was watching Laine last season and he is not good. Weak defensively, no physicality, decent hands but doesn't make up for what he gives up on his side of the red line. Don't want him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hulide
jamiebez

jamiebez

Registered User
Apr 5, 2005
4,025
327
Ottawa
Cowumbus said:
What are you trying to trade home for? Defenseman and picks?
Click to expand...
No defensemen needed. Wow, feels good to say that :D

The need is a winger to replace Copp on the third line for a number we could fit under the cap ($2.5-3M). Recouping some later round picks is good, too.

Lehkonen + 3rd is an idea kicked around on the trade boards that I personally would go for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cypruss and Jetsetter
Jetsfan79

Jetsfan79

Registered User
Jul 12, 2011
3,644
3,496
Winnipeg, MB
What we need for Copp is basically another Copp, That would make a trade difficult because both teams would need to make a borderline parnallel move. Maybe one team will think they're making an upgrade over the other and cap space/gained lost will certainly be part of the equation.

^This is if we trade him of course
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: thereturn and hockeyarena

Dirty30

Registered User
Feb 12, 2012
230
73
Jetsfan79 said:
What we need for Copp is basically another Copp, That would make a trade difficult because both teams would need to make a borderline parnallel move. Maybe one team will think they're making an upgrade over the other and cap space/gained lost will certainly be part of the equation.

^This is if we trade him of course
Click to expand...

I wouldn’t be opposed to getting a player who could be a bit of an agitator [kind of like a Pionk forward] or player that is more of a net front presence. I don’t believe there are players like this on the Jets current roster or their prospect pool.
 

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
22,355
27,245
if domi is the trade option: he's a year away from ufa, would rather just keep copp for the year since that's the case. think copp is a more versatile player able to play both C and W very well, better defensively, and showed some good PP numbers last year. Domi is better offensively though.

imo - if copp wants 5m i think you move on at that price. trade him for the best package of picks or prospects available. im bias - but am a big tatar fan esp back to the Wings days. i think as a top-9 fwd he can replace what perreault did for us in terms of being a possession-god out there, as well as high proficiency of 5v5 offense. his value is likely low since he had a poor finish to his tenure in MTL and i doubt he's getting lucrative offers from other teams. he might settle for a 1-2 year deal at 2-3m or something like that.

in terms of 5v5 offense over the past 3 years, tatar ranks 22nd in the nhl in total points, only Jet ahead of him is Scheifele. in terms of efficiency (pts/60) he's 19th over the same time-frame. could be a good "buy-low" guy that can slot in your middle-6.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jets 31, Flair Hay, mondo3 and 1 other person
GeorgeJETson

GeorgeJETson

Hnidy probably has us on his no trade list
Sponsor
Sep 30, 2016
7,584
18,509
Jetsfan79 said:
What we need for Copp is basically another Copp, That would make a trade difficult because both teams would need to make a borderline parnallel move. Maybe one team will think they're making an upgrade over the other and cap space/gained lost will certainly be part of the equation.

^This is if we trade him of course
Click to expand...

I wouldn't mind moving Copp for futures. For instance, if part of a package that brings in a promising RHD prospect
 
  • Like
Reactions: boydkc and Cypruss

GCn07

Registered User
Feb 27, 2018
127
255
Jetsfan79 said:
What we need for Copp is basically another Copp, That would make a trade difficult because both teams would need to make a borderline parnallel move. Maybe one team will think they're making an upgrade over the other and cap space/gained lost will certainly be part of the equation.

^This is if we trade him of course
Click to expand...

What we need for Copp is a poor man's version of Copp....one we could afford. I think if we could find a 3rd liner that is solid defensively + picks/prospect that would be what we are looking for. Copp brings some offence to the third line and is a potential top 6 on some teams. We would not recover that in trade and get the cap number we need in order to facilitate the trade in the first place. Therefore, we are not looking to replace Copp with Copp....we are looking to replace Copp with, pardon the expression, Copp Light. That is achievable. Assuming, of course, that we can't find a way to fit Copp in under the cap because that is what this all predicates on...otherwise we keep him imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jetsfan79

JetsUK

Registered User
Oct 1, 2015
6,863
14,579
GCn07 said:
What we need for Copp is a poor man's version of Copp....one we could afford. I think if we could find a 3rd liner that is solid defensively + picks/prospect that would be what we are looking for. Copp brings some offence to the third line and is a potential top 6 on some teams. We would not recover that in trade and get the cap number we need in order to facilitate the trade in the first place. Therefore, we are not looking to replace Copp with Copp....we are looking to replace Copp with, pardon the expression, Copp Light. That is achievable. Assuming, of course, that we can't find a way to fit Copp in under the cap because that is what this all predicates on...otherwise we keep him imo.
Click to expand...

i


Alas, poor Archie, we barely knew ye...
 
  • Like
Reactions: kanadalainen

Weezeric

Registered User
Jan 27, 2015
4,501
6,633
GCn07 said:
What we need for Copp is a poor man's version of Copp....one we could afford. I think if we could find a 3rd liner that is solid defensively + picks/prospect that would be what we are looking for. Copp brings some offence to the third line and is a potential top 6 on some teams. We would not recover that in trade and get the cap number we need in order to facilitate the trade in the first place. Therefore, we are not looking to replace Copp with Copp....we are looking to replace Copp with, pardon the expression, Copp Light. That is achievable. Assuming, of course, that we can't find a way to fit Copp in under the cap because that is what this all predicates on...otherwise we keep him imo.
Click to expand...

I proposed Copp for Lehkonen and a 3rd on the main board. I think that’s pretty good for both teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamiebez
Jetsfan79

Jetsfan79

Registered User
Jul 12, 2011
3,644
3,496
Winnipeg, MB
GeorgeJETson said:
I wouldn't mind moving Copp for futures. For instance, if part of a package that brings in a promising RHD prospect
Click to expand...

What's problematic with that is we run the risk of turning the 3rd line to another 4th line and become even more top heavy. If we do a futures deal with Copp, then we need to get a Tatar or similar player I think..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom