hockeywiz542
Registered User
- May 26, 2008
- 15,920
- 4,990
These look like playoff options just swap ROR into 3C and Acciari for Simmonds.Jesus Christ how many times are the lines gonna change? Give some time for them to grow some chemistry Keefe.
I like these ones better than yesterday at least
These aaaight. Simmonds is stunting for acciari. RoR will come to the dirty third like you said.These look like playoff options just swap ROR into 3C and Acciari for Simmonds.
D options look similar to last playoff setup as well
Don't bet on it. He keeps changing them even after good performances.Maybe we can keep these lines for more than 1 game
Liljegren has been playing like shit, no problem with him sitting out. Unfortunately that applies to many other players too, who Keefe wouldn't even dream of holding accountableKeefe has to go. No excuses for sitting Lily anymore. Time to actually pick some defensive pairings and stick with them so the guys can build a little chemistry with the playoffs right around the corner
Fair, though I don't think pulling guys in and out of the lineup is going to help them elevate their play. Obviously as you mentioned he just seems to not like younger defendersLiljegren has been playing like shit, no problem with him sitting out. Unfortunately that applies to many other players too, who Keefe wouldn't even dream of holding accountable
Just another Keefe putting names in a hat.The forward lines seem fine (exception maybe for the 4th line-Simmonds). Not crazy about that Rielly-Schenn pairing on the blueline though (the disparity between minutes averaged for each).
Still have to see how this plays out in "practice" (the games) before passing judgement. For now, it's just an observation that stands out to me for the wrong reason (in theory).Just another Keefe putting names in a hat.
That has been done before. Leafs lost 10 in a row and won a cup.
The difference is Keefe wants you to think he is a genius, where Imlach said he didn't know what to do and called on King C to help.
That’s awesome