Top Centers by WAR Heading Into the 2019-20 Season

NHL WAR

Registered User
Sep 29, 2018
959
1,177
Round 2. I'll start off this time by clarifying that the specific rankings aren't the be all end all. They are made just using WAR. It is a 1.0 template list that could be further refined with the eye test and additional data.

That being said, here is the top 10:
McDavid
Crosby
Stamkos
Matthews
Tavares
Barkov
MacKinnon
Bergeron
Point
Malkin

Order may a bit off, but the players are pretty spot on. Point is the only one that didn't make the top 10 in the poll a couple weeks back.

Here is the full list:
The Top 31 Centers by WAR Entering the 2019-20 NHL Season
 

Krewe

Registered User
Mar 12, 2019
1,676
1,917
Point is the only one that didn't make the top 10 in the poll a couple weeks back.
Still don't understand how Stamkos was voted top 10 but not Point. There is a reason Stamkos got demoted to 2C. Stamkos puts up big numbers but Point is better now after last season (I am aware your model uses a larger sample size)
 
  • Like
Reactions: J T Money and DanM

Breakers

Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Aug 5, 2014
21,594
20,035
Denver Colorado
WAR doesn't work in hockey. No one player can shape a game like they can in baseball, maybe a goalie. If one player could change a game, the Oilers would have won the cup 5 years running.

Do they have WAR in basketball?
I feel it would be really relevant there because one guy in basketball can really really shape the game.
I've seen Lebron drag rotting corpes into the playoffs.
 

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,361
25,425
Fremont, CA
WAR doesn't work in hockey. No one player can shape a game like they can in baseball, maybe a goalie. If one player could change a game, the Oilers would have won the cup 5 years running.

I don’t agree with this. I think that the WAR models that exist today in hockey aren’t nearly as comprehensive or accurate as the WAR models that exist in baseball, but they’re still a useful tool that provides value and they’re worth looking at.
 

Burke the Legend

Registered User
Feb 22, 2012
8,317
2,850
Kind of a fail article, the methodology section doesn't even discuss how the WAR score is calculated. We may be able to get some kind of reasonable WAR score eventually in hockey (although it still wouldn't be as close to precise as baseball) but the stats guys don't have all the right tracking tools yet as the tech is still not there yet, plus there's a number of competitive models with regards to calculations.

BTW Big fan of Brayden Point but I'm not sure if his 21.5 shooting % from last year is sustainable.
 

Rebels57

Former Flyers fan
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
76,858
123,524
Nice to see Sean "not a top 50 player according to TSN" Couturier ranked as the 14th best Center in WAR. Then again, he's top 10-20 in pretty much every metric you can reasonably use to rate a forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NHL WAR

Trap Jesus

Registered User
Feb 13, 2012
28,686
13,457
Did you take into account the missed games for Bergeron? I think you did that for Hall in the last one you did.
 

ToDavid

Registered User
Dec 13, 2018
4,097
5,108
WAR doesn't work in hockey. No one player can shape a game like they can in baseball, maybe a goalie. If one player could change a game, the Oilers would have won the cup 5 years running.

Saying it "doesn't work" is a bit of an oversimplification. It may never be the be-all-end-all stat like it can be in other sports but it can be a useful metric as long as you understand its limitations.
 

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Sponsor
Oct 23, 2014
28,837
40,525
WAR doesn't work in hockey. No one player can shape a game like they can in baseball, maybe a goalie. If one player could change a game, the Oilers would have won the cup 5 years running.

And one player can make more of a difference in baseball?

Value over Replacement Player stats work more in baseball because it's a more individual sport. You can't be carried or elevated much offensively or defensively like you can be by a linemate or teammate in hockey. For offensive players, it's just you vs a major league pitcher repeated a bunch of times and those results can be compared to other hitter vs pitcher matchups fared.
 

Nineteen67

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 12, 2017
23,155
10,399
WAR doesn't work in hockey. No one player can shape a game like they can in baseball, maybe a goalie. If one player could change a game, the Oilers would have won the cup 5 years running.

Maybe you need you more than just one guy, I don’t know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sick Nuzuki

Gary Nylund

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
30,243
22,918
I don’t agree with this. I think that the WAR models that exist today in hockey aren’t nearly as comprehensive or accurate as the WAR models that exist in baseball, but they’re still a useful tool that provides value and they’re worth looking at.

Agreed and that list looks pretty good too. I mean people will never agree 100% on anything but if 9 out of the 10 on this list match the poll recently taken here, it's hard to really complain about this. Is there any other stat that would come this close to matching the players picked in the poll? I doubt it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NHL WAR

lomiller1

Registered User
Jan 13, 2015
6,409
2,968
What WAR model are you using, because there is a lot of variation between them. Something to keep in mind is that (AFAIK) none of the commonly available WAR models do particularly well as predictive metrics. IOW they work better for describing what a player did than predicting what they will do. The @DTMAH model showed good results in out of sample tests, but it hasn’t been publically available for a few years now.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad