RandyHolt
Keep truckin'
- Nov 3, 2006
- 34,812
- 7,145
I love tom willson and will give him an old DVD I have for xmas!!!!!1!1
Arti another bender? Lol....why not let KSD enjoy himself?
This is getting absurd. The others Caps didn't have anything to do with "neutralizing" Karlsson?
Further, there have probably been quite a number of physical players who have at one point made an impact by damaging an opposition star during playoffs. Should they all get paid like those stars then? And why stop at Karlsson for a comparison -- since there's indeed more to hockey than goals. If Wilson can damage McDavid with a hit, maybe he should get paid 10M+? Brilliant!
This is getting absurd. The others Caps didn't have anything to do with "neutralizing" Karlsson?
Further, there have probably been quite a number of physical players who have at one point made an impact by damaging an opposition star during playoffs. Should they all get paid like those stars then? And why stop at Karlsson for a comparison -- since there's indeed more to hockey than goals. If Wilson can damage McDavid with a hit, maybe he should get paid 10M+? Brilliant!
I mean, really? I love Wilson, but it's a massive and unwarranted logical leap to attribute Karlsson's possible disappearance to a hit. Defensemen bailing out in fear when he's coming in on the forecheck is a real, observable thing. This is just speculation, and far from the simplest explanation, which is that strong team defense limited Karlsson and a number of other players.
So what is that worth? A guy who can make people do that in the SCF or the ECF, when it is supposed to be "pay the price" time?
And look at the inverse of that... numerous times we saw TWil take a big hit to make a breakout pass, that sprung a breakaway that lead to a goal. Thats the sort of thing that Cup winners do, and the Caps have historically lacked. What is that worth?
Thank you...I will show myself out?
You think there's a debate as to whether Wilson injured opponents?I can't believe this is still going, and that it's now hinging on whether or not TW hurt/injured opponents
You can't seriously have got that from his post. He's saying he can't believe there's a debate over hurt vs. injure as regards Willy's value.You think there's a debate as to whether Wilson injured opponents?
Is he saying there's a debate as to whether he injured William Karlsson or whether he hurt Karlsson so he didn't compete as hard in the Finals? Or whether that was taken into account for his salary?You can't seriously have got that from his post. He's saying he can't believe there's a debate over hurt vs. injure as regards Willy's value.
What? I don't even understand the question. I'll let him answer for himself.Is he saying there's a debate as to whether he injured William Karlsson or whether he hurt Karlsson so he didn't compete as hard in the Finals? Or whether that was taken into account for his salary?
You think there's a debate as to whether Wilson injured opponents?
What are you reading? He made no such claim.
I read this like I can't believe people are saying that Wilson injured and/or hurt people and are also saying he got more money for injuring or hurting opponents and that if you watch him play with no preconceptions that you too will see that he is worth 6yr/$31M physicality notwithstanding.I can't believe this is still going, and that it's now hinging on whether or not TW hurt/injured opponents and if that translates to cash.
I also wonder what people are seeing when they watch him play. He's not the same guy he was 5 years ago but I believe some are still viewing him through that lens.
Many will reluctantly concede his forechecking has become top notch, and his hitting and PKing are elite. But what few will admit is that his hands and awareness have also developed considerably in just the past year. Gone are the days where you should be flat out shocked iF he puts together 2-3 dekes and a pass, or relieved if he doesn't have the puck explode off his stick on a bang-bang play. He anticipates the flow of the play and goes exactly where he's needed 90% of the time, and more often than not he can make a few nice plays with his stick and his feet.
What he doesn't do, yet, is pull off the flashy puck control moves at top speed like the elite scoring forwards, and he may never do that. That's what people seem to fault him for, and why they drop him down so many notches. But if he can learn to power through opponents with 1 or 2 moves and pure physical force/speed like Ovechkin did in his early years he will become a force on the rush and then LOOK OUT.
Is he saying there's a debate as to whether he injured William Karlsson or whether he hurt Karlsson so he didn't compete as hard in the Finals? Or whether that was taken into account for his salary?
Was quoting g00n a couple of posts before, but I believe Wilson injuring people generally within the flow of a hockey game has value (as opposed to stepping on guys or slew footing or whatever). It's what makes him so unique.If you're talking about me (referring to me as "he" in this post), I never said any such thing as this, but Arti tried to twist my words into something along those lines. I stated clearly that injuring people is not a skill that adds value, any old bum can cheap shot or accidentally injure an opponent and that is very specifically NOT what I am referring to about TW. What I DID say about TW is that he has an ability to be phsyically imposing that has a potential to alter how opponents play against him, and THAT has value! I then used some specific examples of how, late in a series, Dmen cough up the puck rather than take the full brunt of a hit. Simplified, Willy can wear people down like few others can, and THAT has value. Also referred to how TW will take a hit to make a play, and that has value.
I never said a single darn thing about injuring anyone, or being able to injure people having value - NOTHING OF THAT SORT. Others tried to put those words in my mouth but I spit them back out promptly.
I read this like I can't believe people are saying that Wilson injured and/or hurt people and are also saying he got more money for injuring or hurting opponents and that if you watch him play with no preconceptions that you too will see that he is worth 6yr/$31M physicality notwithstanding.
The idea that the threat of pain is going to affect the way an NHL player is going to play is demeaning to NHL players. But I saw an Islanders team check out after seeing 38 year old Visnovsky’s career end.Given the words I used and the context of the rest of my post I hoped it would be clear that I think it's ridiculous this discussion is devolving into narrow definitions of "hurt" and "injure" and then attaching dollar values to that as if it's the main selling point for his skills, or that he's merely a wrecking ball with value based on "damage" to his targets.
Wilson's physicality is a part of the package, as is intimidation and threat of PAIN. But when we're so far into the thread, and that's what hometown fans are still talking about, it seems cheap and demeaning, and plays directly into the caricature that's been built up by fans of all the other teams. Nobody who's a fan of this team or who has watched Wilson with even the slightest bit of hockey acumen should be falling for such a line.
The idea that the threat of pain is going to affect the way an NHL player is going to play is demeaning to NHL players. But I saw an Islanders team check out after seeing 38 year old Visnovsky’s career end.