Lafleurs Guy
Guuuuuuuy!
- Jul 20, 2007
- 75,183
- 45,006
I guess it gives us a bit of cap space but he'd better put it to good use.*puts on helmet*
If, and only if, Tinordi never ever ****ing is anything else than a reserve for a third pair... then I like the trade.
*ducks*
As a Jets fan I have to ask why?
Pick up two guys on 1 way contracts and trade away two guys on 2 way contracts. How does this make sense.
If they wanted to make room, why not just waive Tinordi?
As a Jets fan I have to ask why?
Pick up two guys on 1 way contracts and trade away two guys on 2 way contracts. How does this make sense.
If they wanted to make room, why not just waive Tinordi?
As a Jets fan I have to ask why?
Pick up two guys on 1 way contracts and trade away two guys on 2 way contracts. How does this make sense.
If they wanted to make room, why not just waive Tinordi?
As a Jets fan I have to ask why?
Pick up two guys on 1 way contracts and trade away two guys on 2 way contracts. How does this make sense.
If they wanted to make room, why not just waive Tinordi?
As I said in other thread. Tinordi sucks, no problem. He had no value. I'm just kind of weirded out about the situation. The trade is minor, means nothing but we kind of killed Tinordi's value.
Took him 30+ games to play his first NHL game this year. Mind boggling that he waited that long.
Sure, even if he sucks you have to showcase him or something.
As a Jets fan I have to ask why?
Pick up two guys on 1 way contracts and trade away two guys on 2 way contracts. How does this make sense.
If they wanted to make room, why not just waive Tinordi?
Shocking that a purely minor league transactional trade, gets this much hype here.
This place is nearly unbearable right now...yet I can't look away lol
Maybe they actually wanted those guys for the AHL? That's the only explanation I can come up with.
This trade doesn't bother me that much. It's irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. What bothers me is the rest of MB's work, or lack thereof.