Yeah I'm sure the DA is going around emphasizing these things because a dropped case is a loss for them so they are managing the message. They can say what they want but its not consistent with how the case has unfolded. I agree we'll never know what happened but I'm not buying the message.
I guess what my point is they never should have charged Varly. Arrest ok, if their hand was forced based on the statements given and any evidence, if there was any. I understand the whole protect women and enforce DV standards, take a stand against giving free passes to high proile athletes and all that. But they had a month to investigate and consider the facts before moving forward with the case. I refuse to believe the evidence and case has significantly changed in the last three weeks that wasn't already evident in their month long investigation. That's the whole part of the process that I don't agree with. They made a spectacle out of Varly when it didn't need to be. Did you guys see that photo of him in court with dozens of cameras inches from him? They dropped the kidnapping charge because they couldn't prove it, well clearly they could never prove any of it. So they had to drag this out a month longer than they needed to for what?
