The unraveling of Tuukka Rask

Bruin4Life

Registered User
Nov 6, 2006
1,932
754
One of the ultimate issues in Beantown is Rask and what is to be expected from a #1 goalie. Rask is a #1 goalie and a good goalie at that but there is a divide on the Bruins board between Rask vs. Not Rask and this can be stemmed back to the TT days.

People can say that the team looks like they have play better infront of Dobby which is a similar remark to the Timmy days as well when Rask wasnt #1.

Now I know that Save % is not the tell tale all of a goalie. Its just a stat I pulled as a similarity chart. I didnt want to go and start creating charts and mapping out each advanced stat so bear with it.

Comparison Chart of Goalies with similar contracts

NameYear SignedStats year before Salary % in year of signing#years with stat increase/similar signing date stats#years with significant stat decreaseVerdict
Carey Price
Age(29)
20172.23 GAA .923 SV%14%-- - No stats yet
King Henrik
Age(25)
2008 2.23 GAA
.912 SV%
13.67%6 years (.916, .921, .923, .930, .926, .920) All years showed an improved stats from signing date.
Giggy
Age(30)
2007 2.28 GAA
.918 SV%
13.64%1 Year
(.922)
3 years
(.900, .900 ,.900)
Stanley Cup contract.Lost spot to Jonas Hiller and then traded to TML for Jason Blake and Toskala. Not worth it post contract.
King Henrik
Age(31)
2013 2.05 GAA .926 SV%13.22%1 year
(.922)
3 years
(.920, .910, .918[this is this years numbers])
Had one year with slight decrease but put it as similar, the .920 is still great but still can be seen as a dropoff from .926. I say its stagnant and you can expect numbers between .915-9.20
Manny Fernandez
Age(31)
2006 2.29 GAA .91911.11%2 years
(.911, .910)
Decrease in stats which led to lost of job to Backstrom. Traded to Boston for Petr Kalus and a 4th round pick. Backup to Thomas before retirement.
Cam Ward
Age(25)
2009 2.44 GGA
.916 SV%
11.09%2 years
(.923, .916)
4 years
(.908, .898, .910, .909
Slight increase in stats then steep decline.String of injuries which led to Khudobin playing well then failing to permanently steal his job.
Tuukka Rask
Age(26)
2013 2.00 GGA .929 SV%10.89%1 year (.930)4 year (.920, .915, .915, .899[this is this years numbers]) 1 year which was stagnant before seeing a drop off to .920. Another dropoff to .915 before replicating .915. Bad start to this year but could turn it around.
Carey Price
Age(24)
20122.43 GAA .916 SV%10.83%4 years (.927, .933, .934, .923)2 years
(.905, .890 [this is this years numbers])
Worth it. Saw consistency with a major bump up in stats. This year is a down year but still unwritten.
Rick Dipietro
Age(24)
2006 3.02 GAA
.900 SV%
10.23%1 year (.919)(.902) then ... wtf Mike Milbury COME ON WHAT WERE YOU THINKING
Sergei Bobrosvsky
Age(26)
2015 2.69 GAA .918 SV%10.18%2 years (.931, .936 [this is this years numbers])1 year (.908) First year saw his numbers drop but had an excellent bounce back since with the resurgence of CBJ
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Ive included that table of elite goalies that were worth the contract and other contracts of goalies with similar salary cap % holding. People like to compare Rask to Hank, Price and Bob due to their high numbers. Price was 100% his last contract but im scared of that massive contract that kicks in next year. It could end up being a DiPietro trainwreck. Hank had his first contract which he lived up to and is putting up respectable numbers in that second monster contract. He is an elite goaltender that gets paid. Bob has been stellar in his contract but its just the start of that big contract so we cant really say whether its amazing or not. Rask has had more down years than up years in comparison to others and I would say a better comparison for him would be the Cam Ward circa 2009-2012.

Lets look at the years post contract signing for Rask


2012-2013:

June 1. Tim Thomas says hes sitting out this year for personal family reasons + strain on his body [Thomas had a clause that specified he could not be traded before July1 ,2012. I think Chia wanted Rask to be the future and trade Thomas while the value was high to let Tuukka take the reigns]
June 28 Tuukka signs a prove me contract for 3.5 mil
End of 2013 season Bruins make it to the Conference Finals where 2 goals in the final few minutes (literally final few) sees them end it at Game 6.

Tuukka Rask posts a .929 save% 2.00 GAA in season and a .940 % 1.88 GAA in playoffs

2013-2014 season YEAR ONE OF NEW CONTRACT
From last seasons fantastic run Chia throws a whomping 8 year @ 7 mil per with the Chiarelli special (NMC) . Dobby departs to try to earn his keep as a true #1
Another solid year for Rask as he has something to prove it seems to show its not a fluke run. Stagnant numbers which is great at this level.
We see Chad Johnson come in and post stellar but comparable numbers as a backup (0.925 save %)

Tuukka Rask posts a .930 save% 2.04 GAA in season and a .928 % 1.99 GAA in playoffs Miniscule Microscopic decrease in stats

2014-2015 season

Here we see Tuukkas workload increase as they try there hand at Svedberg for their backup. Although Svedbergs numbers were decent and comparable his issue was consistency as hed be phenomenal one game and then catastrophic the next. Svedberg would put up a save % of .918 and a GAA of 2.33.

Tuukka would come in and put up .920 save % and a 2.30 GAA. A decrease in performance since signing

The bruins needed 2 points in the last 3 games of the year to secure a spot in the playoffs. A no show by the team in all 3 with some iffy goals killed that team who was on a hot seat.

2015-2016 season

Bye Bye Chiapet. Adios Hamilton. We miss you Lucic. Two bad memorys of this year; the career of Joonas Kem-pain-anana the other being the last game of the year. We have Gustavson as a backup who posts 2.72 GAA and .908. Bruins can decide their own fate in the final game against Ottawa after beating the Detroit Red Wings 2 days prior. All they have to do is get one point. Lots of pressure and Rask literally shits his pants prior to the game and can't play forcing Gus to get wrecked. Bad luck for Rasks bowels to start to move.

Tuukka posts a 2.56 GAA and .915 save% for the season. A decrease from his last year.

2016-2017 season

Return of Dobby to Boston. Julien is in the hotseat now. Julien is 26-23-6. Everyone was saying that Dobby (1-5-1) was abysmal that year. No excuses as he is replaced by McIntyre who was put up worse numbers then Dobby. Julien gets fired and we see a resurgence in everyone including our backup Dobby who goes 6-1 in the last 3 months. One thing sticks out to everyone yet again though on March 25th against the Islanders. Rask played in the past 4 games prior to the Islanders and had some very rough goings losing all 4 games and letting in 15 goals in that span of 4. The Bruins playoffs hopes are again seeming to slip away from them as they were solidying their spot in the playoffs to now looking to be leap frogged by the Islanders who had 2 games in hand all the Islanders had to do was beat them on March 25th and the Islanders would be tied with Bruins at that points while still having 2 games in hand. Enter Rask. Sorry, exit Rask. Hours before this huge game Rask says he has an undisclosed injury to even Cassidys surprise that he even had one and said he expects Rask for practice on Monday. Dobby performs huge and Bruins break the funk and Rask is then cured of his mysterious ailment and continues on.

Tuukka posts a 2.33 GAA and a .915 save % slight increase from his previous year. 2.24 GAA and a .920 which are still great numbers but a decrease from his usual playoff spectacular performances. I dont blame anything on him in the playoffs though because I am still cheesed at how the refs were working over the Bruins to keep a Canadian team alive in the playoffs by disallowing good goals multiple times and handing over penalties left right and center.

2017-2018

RASK: 13 GP :2.91 GAA so far and a .899 %. 3 wins
Dobby 10GP : 2.22 GAA so far and a .932% 7 wins

Now I am not saying Dobby is the clear cut winner and a better goalie but he has played better this year than Rask has.


The Antics of Rask

Now I know people love to see a hot headed goalie and you may hear that Bruins fans are starting to say that he is emotionless or doesnt care. Since Rask has entered the league he has had his temper tantrums like the Milk Crate Incident. Watching every Bruins game since 2004-2005 I have seen all of Rask that I can. I love to see a goalie with passion and fire like Thomas or Hextal. Rask doesnt take it out on the other team but instead his own team. I can remember loads of times where after a goal was scored, and the defence was at fault, Rask can be seen glaring at the player in fault or waving his arms at the player (if someone could find the videos). Its been commented on by broadcasters during intermissions and has been talked about on the bruins board before but never spotlighted.

This year he made a comment about the team and later retracted it saying it was taken out of context. Its passive aggressive or mis-worded.
“I just try to go out there and give us a chance to win every night. That’s what I’m focused on. I’m not going to comment anymore on team play that much. We can just talk about goaltending. That’s just the way it is. Sorry.”

Rask Lovers can come in and point out that
  1. Our team sucks infront of him only (Is it by chance/luck , is it that Dobby is more of a scrambled mess so players feel pressured to scramble as well, is it that Rask dug a hole with his mates)
  2. Look at Price and Hank have off years (well they also had good years which Rask cant seem to match consistently)
  3. Who else do the Bruins have that could replace him ? No one? So lets keep saying Rask is our elite #1 and hope he can bounce back
  4. The shots that others take on Rask are impossible to stop whereas Dobby gets the easier ones.


What is the main boards thought on this? I look at the numbers and the eye test. Rask just seems out of it and I have been a Rask supporter up until his mysterious injury last year.


TL;DR Rask gets compared to Hank and Price but cant put up anywhere close the consistency. Rask is not and has not been elite for a long time. He is an above average goalie who gets paid to be elite.
 
Last edited:

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,323
139,061
Bojangles Parking Lot
People can say that the team looks like they have play better infront of Dobby which is a similar remark to the Timmy days as well when Rask wasnt #1.

I haven't watched the Bruins much lately, but what springs to mind immediately for me is that Thomas and Khudobin were very similar goalies in a lot of ways. In particular, both of them played a very aggressive, "challenging" type of style that really requires the defense to cover rebounds and backdoor passes. Rask is not that type of goalie, and it may very well be that the Boston defense is simply better suited to playing with one type of goalie than the other.

Also, for what it's worth...

Cam Ward
Age(25)
2009 2.44 GGA
.916 SV%
11.09%2 years
(.923, .916)
4 years
(.908, .898, .910, .909
Slight increase in stats then steep decline.Lost full time duty to Justin Peters/Dan Ellis/Anton Khudobin in 2012-2014 before reclaiming it.
[TBODY] [/TBODY]


The bolded isn't entirely accurate. Ward was still an outstanding, workhorse goalie up through the end of 2012 and into 2013. He was injured with like 8 weeks left in the lockout season, hence Ellis/Peters getting all the starts from that point on and equaling Ward's playing time... but Ward was never the backup. The following season, Ward was the #1 until he went down with consecutive groin injuries and missed a couple of months, then basically alternated games with red-hot Khudobin when he got back. Khudobin ended up with more GP primarily by virtue of Ward's having missed almost a third of the season with injury. By that time Ward was definitely on the decline, but again he never really lost that starting position and in the following season's training camp Khudobin fumbled the opportunity to take the #1 spot.
 

kingsholygrail

We've made progress - Robitaille
Sponsor
Dec 21, 2006
81,740
16,127
Derpifornia
I think you should include contract length or years left on there. I don't really know the details of Rask's contract, but most goalies go through tough years in their careers. I don't watch enough Bruins games really judge Rask as a goalie, but he seems good enough, just maybe not good enough this year?

And what is the depth of goalies for the Bruins? I know for a while the Kings had a bit of a log jam and kept losing back ups to FA/trade because Quick maintains his hold on the starting job(deservedly too). If the Bruins are grooming a replacement, just deal with Rask for now and when the time is right, give the job to the new guy.
 

Bruin4Life

Registered User
Nov 6, 2006
1,932
754
The bolded isn't entirely accurate. Ward was still an outstanding, workhorse goalie up through the end of 2012 and into 2013. He was injured with like 8 weeks left in the lockout season, hence Ellis/Peters getting all the starts from that point on and equaling Ward's playing time... but Ward was never the backup. The following season, Ward was the #1 until he went down with consecutive groin injuries and missed a couple of months, then basically alternated games with red-hot Khudobin when he got back. Khudobin ended up with more GP primarily by virtue of Ward's having missed almost a third of the season with injury. By that time Ward was definitely on the decline, but again he never really lost that starting position and in the following season's training camp Khudobin fumbled the opportunity to take the #1 spot.

I was trying to find an injury list to check this out but couldnt find one. I just looked at the different numbers and noticed these goalies were playing much better than Ward.
ll update it. Also to note, you are spot on about the difference of play for the defence and forward. The team sees that Dobby and Thomas are aggressive which leaves the net wide open at times which creates a panic to dive infront of the net/clear out the net faster so they can reset. Rask plays very deep in his net which makes it seem that he has it covered and there is less panic. Even as a fan, when the goalie is out we panic and react by screaming which I think the players do as well.

Also the defence has been overhauled as well as the system. Cant say its better suited for that panic system when McQuaid and Chara are the only remaining dmen left from Timmy days and McQuaid is hurt more than playing.

I think you should include contract length or years left on there. I don't really know the details of Rask's contract, but most goalies go through tough years in their careers. I don't watch enough Bruins games really judge Rask as a goalie, but he seems good enough, just maybe not good enough this year?

And what is the depth of goalies for the Bruins? I know for a while the Kings had a bit of a log jam and kept losing back ups to FA/trade because Quick maintains his hold on the starting job(deservedly too). If the Bruins are grooming a replacement, just deal with Rask for now and when the time is right, give the job to the new guy.

Theres a limit to the table as I was going to put in contract length. Unfortunatelly for Rask but his numbers have been in a decline since his contract signing. Perhaps he played for his contract and now is comfortable with coasting. If we sign a player to a contract worth big dollars, you are looking for similar production or an increase in production. Rask has been going through a rough patch since their stanley cup final loss to Chicago. Bruins just tended to blame other things like being overplayed, not buying into Juliens system anymore, or the defencemen being new.

Rask is on contract until 2020-2021 so midway through is contract. They had a replacement who played poorly here in beantown in Subban but has since sparked his career in Vegas (good for him). Dobby is a free agent after this year and I can't seem him pulling a Thomas (Thomas came out as a #1 at age 31). McIntyre has been up and down as a goalie prospect. Seems shaky and once he lets in one you can guarentee another 3. They have Jeremy Swayman (2017 draft pick) playing great in the NCAA. Kyle Keyser was signed who plays in the OHL but hes been meh. Vlader looks like hes playing well via stats but ive never seem him play
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,323
139,061
Bojangles Parking Lot
Also to note, you are spot on about the difference of play for the defence and forward. The team sees that Dobby and Thomas are aggressive which leaves the net wide open at times which creates a panic to dive infront of the net/clear out the net faster so they can reset. Rask plays very deep in his net which makes it seem that he has it covered and there is less panic. Even as a fan, when the goalie is out we panic and react by screaming which I think the players do as well.

Also the defence has been overhauled as well as the system. Cant say its better suited for that panic system when McQuaid and Chara are the only remaining dmen left from Timmy days and McQuaid is hurt more than playing.

TBH, I think it's a bit easier in general to play defense if you are very very confident of your goalie making the first save, like a Thomas or a Khudobin. Those guys come out and challenge, and can even dance with the shooter a little bit in an effort to get a piece of the first shot. Knowing that, as a defender you don't get out of your lane to challenge the shooter or try to prevent that shot. You just lock down the nearest guy who might get to the rebound, or clear out anyone who's standing near the net. It's a lot easier to play that way than to try and prevent the opponent from ever coming open near the net.

I watched a ton of Bruins back around 2009-2011, and they got extremely good at letting Thomas do his thing while they locked down the back side. And once the shot was taken they punished anyone who tried to play the rebound... which in turn allowed Thomas to sell out on the shooter. It was a perfect balance between the goalie and defense, working as a unit. Sounds like they've got something similar going with Dobby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Save By Thomas

Bruin4Life

Registered User
Nov 6, 2006
1,932
754
TBH, I think it's a bit easier in general to play defense if you are very very confident of your goalie making the first save, like a Thomas or a Khudobin. Those guys come out and challenge, and can even dance with the shooter a little bit in an effort to get a piece of the first shot. Knowing that, as a defender you don't get out of your lane to challenge the shooter or try to prevent that shot. You just lock down the nearest guy who might get to the rebound, or clear out anyone who's standing near the net. It's a lot easier to play that way than to try and prevent the opponent from ever coming open near the net.

I watched a ton of Bruins back around 2009-2011, and they got extremely good at letting Thomas do his thing while they locked down the back side. And once the shot was taken they punished anyone who tried to play the rebound... which in turn allowed Thomas to sell out on the shooter. It was a perfect balance between the goalie and defense, working as a unit. Sounds like they've got something similar going with Dobby.

That makes sense. Last year Dobby was pretty bad under Julien again. As soon as Julien left and Cassidy took over Dobby got revitalized. Dobby was afraid to challenge and make mistakes as Julien became a hard nosed system person where as Cassidy wants to get the best out of the player by letting the player play to his strengths. He has been unstoppable since March of last year.
 

Ainec

Panetta was not racist
Jun 20, 2009
21,784
6,429
"he's better than Carey Price"

edit:

"he's as good as Carey Price, but doesn't get 1/2 the love"
 

Bruin4Life

Registered User
Nov 6, 2006
1,932
754
"he's better than Carey Price"

edit:

"he's as good as Carey Price, but doesn't get 1/2 the love"

Numbers show hes not in the same comparison league as a Carey Price. So thats why he doesnt give half the love as Price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnC

WingsMJN2965

Registered User
Oct 13, 2017
18,106
17,699
Pretty sure we all saw him unravel...

Tuukka-Rask-Fail.gif


anigif_enhanced-buzz-16631-1385141339-16.gif
 

Nickmo82

Registered User
Mar 31, 2012
6,071
4,359
Japan
It hasn't happened this year because... well... you know... the backup is Pavelec, but the past three or four years there was often a lot of comments about how Talbot/Raanta were outplaying Lundqvist. I think it's common to yearn for the backup to come in and take over if they are playing good hockey and your starter is wobbling/giving up softies etc.
 

yangmang

Registered User
Sep 28, 2006
676
65
One of the ultimate issues in Beantown is Rask and what is to be expected from a #1 goalie. Rask is a #1 goalie and a good goalie at that but there is a divide on the Bruins board between Rask vs. Not Rask and this can be stemmed back to the TT days.

People can say that the team looks like they have play better infront of Dobby which is a similar remark to the Timmy days as well when Rask wasnt #1.

Now I know that Save % is not the tell tale all of a goalie. Its just a stat I pulled as a similarity chart. I didnt want to go and start creating charts and mapping out each advanced stat so bear with it.

Comparison Chart of Goalies with similar contracts

NameYear SignedStats year before Salary % in year of signing#years with stat increase/similar signing date stats#years with significant stat decreaseVerdict
Carey Price
Age(29)
20172.23 GAA .923 SV%14%-- - No stats yet
King Henrik
Age(25)
2008 2.23 GAA
.912 SV%
13.67%6 years (.916, .921, .923, .930, .926, .920) All years showed an improved stats from signing date.
Giggy
Age(30)
2007 2.28 GAA
.918 SV%
13.64%1 Year
(.922)
3 years
(.900, .900 ,.900)
Stanley Cup contract.Lost spot to Jonas Hiller and then traded to TML for Jason Blake and Toskala. Not worth it post contract.
King Henrik
Age(31)
2013 2.05 GAA .926 SV%13.22%1 year
(.922)
3 years
(.920, .910, .918[this is this years numbers])
Had one year with slight decrease but put it as similar, the .920 is still great but still can be seen as a dropoff from .926. I say its stagnant and you can expect numbers between .915-9.20
Manny Fernandez
Age(31)
2006 2.29 GAA .91911.11%2 years
(.911, .910)
Decrease in stats which led to lost of job to Backstrom. Traded to Boston for Petr Kalus and a 4th round pick. Backup to Thomas before retirement.
Cam Ward
Age(25)
2009 2.44 GGA
.916 SV%
11.09%2 years
(.923, .916)
4 years
(.908, .898, .910, .909
Slight increase in stats then steep decline.String of injuries which led to Khudobin playing well then failing to permanently steal his job.
Tuukka Rask
Age(26)
2013 2.00 GGA .929 SV%10.89%1 year (.930)4 year (.920, .915, .915, .899[this is this years numbers]) 1 year which was stagnant before seeing a drop off to .920. Another dropoff to .915 before replicating .915. Bad start to this year but could turn it around.
Carey Price
Age(24)
20122.43 GAA .916 SV%10.83%4 years (.927, .933, .934, .923)2 years
(.905, .890 [this is this years numbers])
Worth it. Saw consistency with a major bump up in stats. This year is a down year but still unwritten.
Rick Dipietro
Age(24)
2006 3.02 GAA
.900 SV%
10.23%1 year (.919)(.902) then ... wtf Mike Milbury COME ON WHAT WERE YOU THINKING
Sergei Bobrosvsky
Age(26)
2015 2.69 GAA .918 SV%10.18%2 years (.931, .936 [this is this years numbers])1 year (.908) First year saw his numbers drop but had an excellent bounce back since with the resurgence of CBJ
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Ive included that table of elite goalies that were worth the contract and other contracts of goalies with similar salary cap % holding. People like to compare Rask to Hank, Price and Bob due to their high numbers. Price was 100% his last contract but im scared of that massive contract that kicks in next year. It could end up being a DiPietro trainwreck. Hank had his first contract which he lived up to and is putting up respectable numbers in that second monster contract. He is an elite goaltender that gets paid. Bob has been stellar in his contract but its just the start of that big contract so we cant really say whether its amazing or not. Rask has had more down years than up years in comparison to others and I would say a better comparison for him would be the Cam Ward circa 2009-2012.

Lets look at the years post contract signing for Rask


2012-2013:

June 1. Tim Thomas says hes sitting out this year for personal family reasons + strain on his body [Thomas had a clause that specified he could not be traded before July1 ,2012. I think Chia wanted Rask to be the future and trade Thomas while the value was high to let Tuukka take the reigns]
June 28 Tuukka signs a prove me contract for 3.5 mil
End of 2013 season Bruins make it to the Conference Finals where 2 goals in the final few minutes (literally final few) sees them end it at Game 6.

Tuukka Rask posts a .929 save% 2.00 GAA in season and a .940 % 1.88 GAA in playoffs

2013-2014 season YEAR ONE OF NEW CONTRACT
From last seasons fantastic run Chia throws a whomping 8 year @ 7 mil per with the Chiarelli special (NMC) . Dobby departs to try to earn his keep as a true #1
Another solid year for Rask as he has something to prove it seems to show its not a fluke run. Stagnant numbers which is great at this level.
We see Chad Johnson come in and post stellar but comparable numbers as a backup (0.925 save %)

Tuukka Rask posts a .930 save% 2.04 GAA in season and a .928 % 1.99 GAA in playoffs Miniscule Microscopic decrease in stats

2014-2015 season

Here we see Tuukkas workload increase as they try there hand at Svedberg for their backup. Although Svedbergs numbers were decent and comparable his issue was consistency as hed be phenomenal one game and then catastrophic the next. Svedberg would put up a save % of .918 and a GAA of 2.33.

Tuukka would come in and put up .920 save % and a 2.30 GAA. A decrease in performance since signing

The bruins needed 2 points in the last 3 games of the year to secure a spot in the playoffs. A no show by the team in all 3 with some iffy goals killed that team who was on a hot seat.

2015-2016 season

Bye Bye Chiapet. Adios Hamilton. We miss you Lucic. Two bad memorys of this year; the career of Joonas Kem-pain-anana the other being the last game of the year. We have Gustavson as a backup who posts 2.72 GAA and .908. Bruins can decide their own fate in the final game against Ottawa after beating the Detroit Red Wings 2 days prior. All they have to do is get one point. Lots of pressure and Rask literally ****s his pants prior to the game and can't play forcing Gus to get wrecked. Bad luck for Rasks bowels to start to move.

Tuukka posts a 2.56 GAA and .915 save% for the season. A decrease from his last year.

2016-2017 season

Return of Dobby to Boston. Julien is in the hotseat now. Julien is 26-23-6. Everyone was saying that Dobby (1-5-1) was abysmal that year. No excuses as he is replaced by McIntyre who was put up worse numbers then Dobby. Julien gets fired and we see a resurgence in everyone including our backup Dobby who goes 6-1 in the last 3 months. One thing sticks out to everyone yet again though on March 25th against the Islanders. Rask played in the past 4 games prior to the Islanders and had some very rough goings losing all 4 games and letting in 15 goals in that span of 4. The Bruins playoffs hopes are again seeming to slip away from them as they were solidying their spot in the playoffs to now looking to be leap frogged by the Islanders who had 2 games in hand all the Islanders had to do was beat them on March 25th and the Islanders would be tied with Bruins at that points while still having 2 games in hand. Enter Rask. Sorry, exit Rask. Hours before this huge game Rask says he has an undisclosed injury to even Cassidys surprise that he even had one and said he expects Rask for practice on Monday. Dobby performs huge and Bruins break the funk and Rask is then cured of his mysterious ailment and continues on.

Tuukka posts a 2.33 GAA and a .915 save % slight increase from his previous year. 2.24 GAA and a .920 which are still great numbers but a decrease from his usual playoff spectacular performances. I dont blame anything on him in the playoffs though because I am still cheesed at how the refs were working over the Bruins to keep a Canadian team alive in the playoffs by disallowing good goals multiple times and handing over penalties left right and center.

2017-2018

RASK: 13 GP :2.91 GAA so far and a .899 %. 3 wins
Dobby 10GP : 2.22 GAA so far and a .932% 7 wins

Now I am not saying Dobby is the clear cut winner and a better goalie but he has played better this year than Rask has.


The Antics of Rask

Now I know people love to see a hot headed goalie and you may hear that Bruins fans are starting to say that he is emotionless or doesnt care. Since Rask has entered the league he has had his temper tantrums like the Milk Crate Incident. Watching every Bruins game since 2004-2005 I have seen all of Rask that I can. I love to see a goalie with passion and fire like Thomas or Hextal. Rask doesnt take it out on the other team but instead his own team. I can remember loads of times where after a goal was scored, and the defence was at fault, Rask can be seen glaring at the player in fault or waving his arms at the player (if someone could find the videos). Its been commented on by broadcasters during intermissions and has been talked about on the bruins board before but never spotlighted.

This year he made a comment about the team and later retracted it saying it was taken out of context. Its passive aggressive or mis-worded.


Rask Lovers can come in and point out that
  1. Our team sucks infront of him only (Is it by chance/luck , is it that Dobby is more of a scrambled mess so players feel pressured to scramble as well, is it that Rask dug a hole with his mates)
  2. Look at Price and Hank have off years (well they also had good years which Rask cant seem to match consistently)
  3. Who else do the Bruins have that could replace him ? No one? So lets keep saying Rask is our elite #1 and hope he can bounce back
  4. The shots that others take on Rask are impossible to stop whereas Dobby gets the easier ones.


What is the main boards thought on this? I look at the numbers and the eye test. Rask just seems out of it and I have been a Rask supporter up until his mysterious injury last year.


TL;DR Rask gets compared to Hank and Price but cant put up anywhere close the consistency. Rask is not and has not been elite for a long time. He is an above average goalie who gets paid to be elite.
i think rask is done not elite anymore
 

Ainec

Panetta was not racist
Jun 20, 2009
21,784
6,429
It hasn't happened this year because... well... you know... the backup is Pavelec, but the past three or four years there was often a lot of comments about how Talbot/Raanta were outplaying Lundqvist. I think it's common to yearn for the backup to come in and take over if they are playing good hockey and your starter is wobbling/giving up softies etc.

Talbot was legitimately good. He had a monster season last year but people are trying to re-write it over his start this season
 

Bmessy

Registered User
Nov 25, 2007
3,296
1,601
East Boston, MA
I don't think it's a coincidence that our goalies stats decrease the same time we trade two top 4 D and a top 6 winger for futures. Only now are we seeing the prospects implemented.

But Rask also hasn't covered the teams holes. Thus, we've learned he's only an above average goalie. Thus, I still think he's a top 10 goalie on a good team. Which is good enough to win a Cup. Which means he's overpaid by about 1mil. Which isn't a big enough deal for me to want to get rid of him.
 

BusQuets

Registered User
Jul 16, 2010
11,948
2,875
I see you didn't post their playoffs sv%. You know the stats that matters the most... ;)

I wonder why :popcorn:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad