Prospect Info: The 2015 Draft Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hockey Sports Fan

Registered Loser
Sponsor
Jun 30, 2010
10,633
4,081
Connecticut
Crouse has the look of a wasted pick.

And lucky for us, since I do think the Devils will picking close to 10 than 3, is that ISS currently has Crouse at 3 and Marner 9th. I'd be ecstatic to watch Crouse go that high and see someone fall to us. I'm not too big on Zacha either, but I'd rather him than Tyler Biggs 2.0.
 

MichaelJ

Registered User
May 20, 2013
7,874
766
And lucky for us, since I do think the Devils will picking close to 10 than 3, is that ISS currently has Crouse at 3 and Marner 9th. I'd be ecstatic to watch Crouse go that high and see someone fall to us. I'm not too big on Zacha either, but I'd rather him than Tyler Biggs 2.0.

I've got to imagine those rankings get updated...if we can steal Marner around 7-9 I'd be ecstatic.
 

Brodeur

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
26,108
15,742
San Diego
I've got to imagine those rankings get updated...if we can steal Marner around 7-9 I'd be ecstatic.

ISS list seems a little too reactionary to the WJC. Ie, Strome (and others) getting dropped simply because he wasn't in the tournament.

Hopefully we'll see Bob McKenzie's midterm ranking/survey in the next couple of weeks.
 

Zajacs Bowl Cut

Lets Go Baby
Nov 6, 2005
71,957
44,563
PA
Would you trade Drew Doughty for Colin Wilson?

yet another post that is ignoring what I am saying

I've said multiple times that plenty of high picks bust. you guys are acting like Hanafin is 1000000% guaranteed to be a stud and if we dont take him as BPA at 3, we are 100000% drafting a bust.
 

MichaelJ

Registered User
May 20, 2013
7,874
766
ISS list seems a little too reactionary to the WJC. Ie, Strome (and others) getting dropped simply because he wasn't in the tournament.

Hopefully we'll see Bob McKenzie's midterm ranking/survey in the next couple of weeks.

Makes sense.

Plus, those rankings aren't a blueprint for the order. I'm sure teams will have their own idea of who they want based on their own scouting.
 

Missionhockey

Registered User
Jul 6, 2003
9,006
386
New Jersey
Visit site
yet another post that is ignoring what I am saying

I've said multiple times that plenty of high picks bust. you guys are acting like Hanafin is 1000000% guaranteed to be a stud and if we dont take him as BPA at 3, we are 100000% drafting a bust.

You very rarely make sense that it's hard to gather your point as it is.

Still, you ignored my point which is that if the staff likes a guy and believe he's going to be good, why would they take the next best forward prospect just so they can balance. Makes no sense. I have no feeling toward Hanafin one way or the other, but the scouting staff spends a lot more time researching these guys and picking their brains. If they like a guy then they should go with the guy they like, not just take a guy because the team needs a star forward. Unless that forward's name is McDavid, he's probably not going to be able to step right in and produce anyway.
 

glenwo2

LINDY RUFF NEEDS VIAGRA!!
Oct 18, 2008
52,060
24,347
New Jersey(No Fanz!)
Except the Devils have drafted more forwards than defensemen. Don't let rants get in the way of facts!

http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/draft/teams/dr00007066.html


How about drafting forwards in the 1st round? Haven't done much of that, I don't think.... :dunno:

Anyway, what matters right now is what they do in this coming draft.

I feel they should draft the BEST AVAILABLE *FORWARD* if Strome/Marner are off the board, Period.

Devils need forwards with actual TALENT and not 3 to 5-year projects that may or may not turn out to be NHL material.
 

MadDevil

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2007
33,829
23,698
Bismarck, ND
8 of our last 10 first round picks have been forwards. 13 of our last 18 total picks have been forwards. I guess we should have passed on Severson in 2012 or Santini in 2013 because we need forwards.
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
67,422
31,744
8 of our last 10 first round picks have been forwards. 13 of our last 18 total picks have been forwards. I guess we should have passed on Severson in 2012 or Santini in 2013 because we need forwards.

In regards to the first stat...we haven't had a first-round pick every year either (it doesn't count the pick we traded for Cory for example, or the one we lost for Kovy) so it's more like eight forwards drafted in fifteen years with a first-rounder.

As far as the second stat volume doesn't equal quality. I keep citing this stat but in the last five years combined we've used exactly two first or second round picks on forwards - Matteau/Quenneville. Drafting a bunch of guys in round three and after isn't the same as using high-level assets to address the forward spot.
 

MadDevil

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2007
33,829
23,698
Bismarck, ND
In regards to the first stat...we haven't had a first-round pick every year either (it doesn't count the pick we traded for Cory for example, or the one we lost for Kovy) so it's more like eight forwards drafted in fifteen years with a first-rounder.

As far as the second stat volume doesn't equal quality. I keep citing this stat but in the last five years combined we've used exactly two first or second round picks on forwards - Matteau/Quenneville. Drafting a bunch of guys in round three and after isn't the same as using high-level assets to address the forward spot.

That's fair, but we also had no first rounder in 2010 or 2013. Our first picks those years were Merrill and Santini. Hard to argue against either of those picks. We had no second rounder in 2011. We took Severson in the second in 2012. That's a pretty significant part of the rebuild on defense right there.
 

Zajacs Bowl Cut

Lets Go Baby
Nov 6, 2005
71,957
44,563
PA
You very rarely make sense that it's hard to gather your point as it is.

Still, you ignored my point which is that if the staff likes a guy and believe he's going to be good, why would they take the next best forward prospect just so they can balance. Makes no sense. I have no feeling toward Hanafin one way or the other, but the scouting staff spends a lot more time researching these guys and picking their brains. If they like a guy then they should go with the guy they like, not just take a guy because the team needs a star forward. Unless that forward's name is McDavid, he's probably not going to be able to step right in and produce anyway.

I rarely make sense?

I've said all along that Larsson needed to play more and would be good. I was right.
I've said all along Deboer was an AWFUL coach that went on one lucky run. I was right.


I think I make plenty of sense.
 

MichaelJ

Registered User
May 20, 2013
7,874
766
I rarely make sense?

I've said all along that Larsson needed to play more and would be good. I was right.
I've said all along Deboer was an AWFUL coach that went on one lucky run. I was right.


I think I make plenty of sense.

Those were pretty popular sentiments.
 

OmNomNom

Taco is Love, Taco is Life
Mar 3, 2011
22,992
15,852
In the Church of Salmela
How about drafting forwards in the 1st round? Haven't done much of that, I don't think.... :dunno:

Anyway, what matters right now is what they do in this coming draft.

I feel they should draft the BEST AVAILABLE *FORWARD* if Strome/Marner are off the board, Period.

Devils need forwards with actual TALENT and not 3 to 5-year projects that may or may not turn out to be NHL material.

i predict we finish bottom 7, even with lottery. with that being said, based on ISS rankings i think we're guaranteed one of strome/marner/barzal.

assuming conte doesn't go full Pejorative Slur
 

devilsblood

Registered User
Mar 10, 2010
29,568
11,838
8 of our last 10 first round picks have been forwards. 13 of our last 18 total picks have been forwards. I guess we should have passed on Severson in 2012 or Santini in 2013 because we need forwards.

Very misleading stat given we have drafted a fwd in the first rnd just 4 times in the last 9 drafts.

And while Severson and Santini both look like real good picks, Merrill as well, but all 3 were seen as excellent values at the time of those picks, those guys fell for whatever reason and we were able to jump in and scoop those guys up. but we have not done as good a job of finding similar values with fwd's, a guy like Point would be an example of drafting a guy outside the first rnd who has 1st rnd talent.

And because we were able to find those values, in addition to Larsson, and Gelinas and Helg, while not finding similarly talented fwds, that only furthers our current need of focusing on fwd's in upcoming drafts.
 

Brodeur

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
26,108
15,742
San Diego
So he has Zacha at 17, and Brazal at 18. Yet guys are talking about those guys in the top 10. Whats up with that?

Barzal's been hurt since November, so it's a little strange to see him dropping. Similar thing happened when Colin White fell four spots in a month while he was out with mono. Back in 2012, ISS had Alex Galchenyuk in the 15-20 range most of the year since he was injured but most figured he was still a likely top 7 pick.

Button does get out and scout, but I can't imagine he can put as much effort as a typical NHL scout who doesn't have to balance doing TV. Another poster on the prospects board asked Button why he didn't have Parker Wotherspoon ranked in his top 60 (prior to this list) and Button told him that he hadn't seen him yet this year.

This is why teams will employ scouts to patrol particular leagues/regions. The whole world is too much for one guy to cover.
 

Emperoreddy

Show Me What You Got!
Apr 13, 2010
130,458
76,015
New Jersey, Exit 16E
That's fair, but we also had no first rounder in 2010 or 2013. Our first picks those years were Merrill and Santini. Hard to argue against either of those picks. We had no second rounder in 2011. We took Severson in the second in 2012. That's a pretty significant part of the rebuild on defense right there.

State of the team was a lot different at that time too. Forward situation looked better with JJ and Tedy and still having Zach, while our defensive prospect pool was empty.

We also got stuck with two very late picks becayse of the kovy nonsense and a finals run.

Still took two forwards that more then likley will be decent NHL players at worst (again I think people are to down on Q). Not superstars, but 29 and 30 is not exactly the place to find superstars unless it's a really deep draft or your lucky.
 

New Jack City

Registered User
Dec 28, 2011
1,057
34
I see us being in a position to take Marner/Strome/Zacha and we end up over drafting this Colin White kid. 2 way forward from the US Development program. That Screams conte
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad