Wallet Inspector
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2013
- 5,778
- 5,024
Seeing some of the discussion of pre-Cooke injury Karlsson, and looking back at the 2012-2013 season as a whole, I unironically think the Sens would have been cup contenders if not for injuries.
-Karlsson was otherworldly, and would have easily won the Norris, and hell, even the Hart if not for his injury,
-Spezza was coming off arguably his best all-around season in 2011-2012, and was never quite the same after his back surgery.
-Gonchar had a very impressive season, and even Wiercoch looked good in his rookie year, so our defense as a whole would have been great with EK.
-Our goaltending was stupidly good. Granted, you could argue it was due to Paul Maclean needing us to play a goalie-friendly style due to all our injuries, but healthy Anderson was easily capable of stealing playoff series.
Lastly, while obviously a really small sample size, we DID start the year 5-1-1 before the injuries started to pile up, but what do you guys think?
-Karlsson was otherworldly, and would have easily won the Norris, and hell, even the Hart if not for his injury,
-Spezza was coming off arguably his best all-around season in 2011-2012, and was never quite the same after his back surgery.
-Gonchar had a very impressive season, and even Wiercoch looked good in his rookie year, so our defense as a whole would have been great with EK.
-Our goaltending was stupidly good. Granted, you could argue it was due to Paul Maclean needing us to play a goalie-friendly style due to all our injuries, but healthy Anderson was easily capable of stealing playoff series.
Lastly, while obviously a really small sample size, we DID start the year 5-1-1 before the injuries started to pile up, but what do you guys think?