hamzarocks
Registered User
Leafs move JT for 3M cap savings but 8 years term vs the 2 years left they have on the JT deal.
Who says no?
Assume no issues with NMC
Who says no?
Assume no issues with NMC
Tavares becomes an elite 3C in the playoffs unfortunately.JT Miller comes across as a dink. I don't think I'd want that anywhere close to my locker room if the aim is to have leadership and character for a long playoff drive.
AgreedLeafs say no. Tavares says no. Canucks say no.
Leafs say no. You don't want this year's Miller and betting on last year's version seems highly irresponsible.Leafs move JT for 3M cap savings but 8 years term vs the 2 years left they have on the JT deal.
Who says no?
Assume no issues with NMC
Tavares becomes an elite 3C in the playoffs unfortunately.
He's got 14 pts in 20 games for the leafs thete.
Leafs say no. Tavares says no. Canucks say no.
Or vice versa. That Stache is just wrong.Matthews would end up punching Miller in the face during practice
It's up there.This just might be the worst proposal for the leafs by a leafs fan I've ever seen
LOL for 2 years of Tavares for 7 years of Miller, Vancouver would be the ones sending the picks or sweeteners not Toronto.I can see the Canucks doing this if the Leafs add a 2nd or 3rd round pick and another sweetener