Suter/Coburn/Phaneuf

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by big_steve, Jan 6, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. big_steve

    big_steve Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2003
    Messages:
    871
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Newfoundland
    Who was 1st, 2nd, & 3rd in the World Junior Hockey Championships out of this trio? Also, who will be 1st, 2nd, & 3rd in the NHL out of the trio?
     
  2. puck bunny

    puck bunny Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Phaneuf, Coburn, Suter
     
  3. Aerolanche

    Aerolanche Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6,995
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Suter, Phaneuf, Coburn
     
  4. big_steve

    big_steve Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2003
    Messages:
    871
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Newfoundland
    is that in the World Juniors or there future NHL careers?
     
  5. leafaholix*

    leafaholix* Guest

    WJC...

    1. Dion Phaneuf
    2. Ryan Suter
    3. Braydon Coburn

    NHL... IMO...

    1. Dion Phaneuf
    2. Ryan Suter
    3. Braydon Coburn
     
  6. FacelessButcher

    FacelessButcher Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton
    I agree with this one
     
  7. Slats432

    Slats432 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2002
    Messages:
    12,785
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    176
    Home Page:
    Without a doubt.
     
  8. Seachd

    Seachd Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2002
    Messages:
    19,228
    Likes Received:
    258
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Location:
    The Fail
    Home Page:
    Yep, although I certainly wouldn't be surprised if Suter ends up better than Phaneuf. One thing is sure in my mind, though - Atlanta screwed up big.
     
  9. leafaholix*

    leafaholix* Guest

    The main reason Phaneuf is rated ahead of Suter is because he plays a more physical game... and his offensive abililty isn't as far behind Suter's as most think.

    And Coburn is still a great prospect... he played great in the WJC.
     
  10. Hitman*

    Hitman* Guest

    Suter showed some great composure and Phaneuf was a rock, easily Canada's top defenseman. Can't go wrong with either. Coburn hasn't impressed me at all. His best asset is his skating and size, he didn't use either. I agree, Atlanta got the worst of the three.
     
  11. Mike8

    Mike8 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2002
    Messages:
    11,660
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Home Page:
    For the future, it's tough to say. Coburn doesn't have the mean streak that Phaneuf and Suter do, but he is much bigger and has to fill out a lot more before he can do too much damage on checks. Phaneuf and Suter are stockier builds. While they're not small frames, they don't have to fill out that much more at all before making the NHL and being a physical presence. Coburn could still add 15-20lbs more by the looks of it.

    Phaneuf and Suter are more NHL-ready and more polished at this point. You can tell from interviews that both have a goal, and both are ready to drive through anyone to get to it. Coburn is much more soft spoken from what I've seen, and combined with his play on the ice, he doesn't seem to have that strength and preparedness that the former two defensemen do.

    Since he's more of a raw talent, with a larger frame and wide skating style, I wouldn't count him out of being the more effective NHLer in the long-term. In the shorter-term though, there's little doubt in my mind that Suter and Phaneuf will make a name for themselves before Coburn.
     
  12. PEli*

    PEli* Guest

    I agree. I'm a big fan of dmen that can obliterate a guy for not having his head up so that plays into my opinion, big time. Still, Phaneuf and Suter were my two favorite dmen going in to the tourney and still are.
     
  13. Rabid Ranger

    Rabid Ranger 2 is better than one

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,383
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    199
    Occupation:
    Contract manager
    Location:
    Murica


    I would agree, although I think Suter's NHL potential is probably the greatest of the three. IMO he'll end up being an overall better player, although not nearly as intimidating as Phaneuf. That guy's a freak!
     
  14. leafaholix*

    leafaholix* Guest

    Offensively, Suter's the better of the three. But Phaneuf is also an offensive threat. Plus, when you add the physical play... Phaneuf's the better of the three.

    And when you think of the comparison's...

    Ryan Suter: Gary Suter
    Dion Phaneuf: Scott Stevens

    They're both got crazy good potential.
     
  15. Fighter

    Fighter Always on the move

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,430
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Traveller
    Location:
    Trieste, Italy
    During the Tournament Phaneuf was the best out there, followed by Suter and then Coburn.

    Despite this, as NHL potential I would take Suter over Phaneuf, and then Coburn.
     
  16. nomorekids

    nomorekids The original, baby

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    Messages:
    33,364
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    176
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Home Page:
    i, like most people, was definitely impressed with phaneuf and suter...and less impressed with coburn, but that's how i've felt since the draft. i'm going to disagree with everyone a bit, though...

    now:
    1.phaneuf
    2. suter
    3. coburn

    FUTURE:
    1. suter
    2. phaneuf
    3. coburn

    i think the scott stevens comparison for phaneuf is perfect, but i'm not sure the gary suter comparison is as good for ryan suter. i'm not sure exactly WHO i'd compare ryan to, but i think stylistically lidstrom is closer than gary suter. it's just good to know that a lot of teams that haven't been all that great in years past have such bright futures. i think calgary and nashville are, in about 3-4 years time, going to have the most feared bluelines in the league.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"