Derfel*
Guest
Can anyone confirm when the hearing took place? A friend seems to think the decision was posted publicly before the hearing...
It was an incredibly reckless action from Stafford. Just put yourself in that situation of basically getting two handed across the face with a hockey stick. No complaints.
There's a reason you don't see high sticking that bad, it's because people know not to do it and try not to.
How do you reconcile this with Gregory's mommy being upset?It was an incredibly reckless action from Stafford. Just put yourself in that situation of basically getting two handed across the face with a hockey stick. No complaints.
There's a reason you don't see high sticking that bad, it's because people know not to do it and try not to.
Totally disagree. If he was stuck in a scum or avoiding a body check and manoeuvred in a manner that propelled his stick to hit someone in the head, yes that is reckless. But the difference here is that he is being illegally held. So if someone cross checks you into another player and you accidentally injure him, your responsible?. Ridiculous. A case can almost be made that the player that illegally held Stafford is the reason the injury occured. The 4 minute call was the correct one.
You can't spin around quickly with your stick extended at face level just because you were held.
This can't be okay.