I've stopped responding to your posts, as you may have noticed, but I can't help but respond to this ridiculous post that I stumbled upon after seeing that not everything with the discussion was adding up.
Bellingham, like nearly every other player on the team, played a bad game in a 5-1 loss. So what? And he wasn't that bad compared to some of his teammates. Players like as Guerreiro, Akanji, Can, Witsel, Reus were shambolic. Bellingham was bad, but somewhere in the middle of the team, in terms of performances for that game. To make a big point over that game makes no sense, to begin with. What was your thoughts about how he played on Tuesday? I'm sure you have no thoughts because you probably didn't watch the game. Did you even watch him play on Saturday or are you guessing that Bellingham was bad in a big loss? To answer that initial question, Bellingham played very well on Tuesday, like usual.
Second of all, I didn't say anything about Cherki's playing time. I said he's not producing, which is probably why Cherki doesn't play very much. If you are an attacking midfielder and can't score goals or assist them, you likely won't play very much in a good team. I never said that Cherki isn't a big talent or won't be very good eventually, but yes, he is absolutely not impacting games right now anywhere near what Wirtz or Bellingham are. There are one or two others in the top leagues who are impacting games more from that age group.