so now we've gone from heartfelt remembrance, to insignificant concession and lip-service to fulfil the players desire to wear their chosen number...so why are doing it again?
Okay, it seems you've misunderstood me.
So, in point form:
* This gesture by the franchise is indeed one of heartfelt remembrance, and I think the story of the Snyder family merits being remembered at the NHL level, and we are the ones fit to do it.
* Your opinion of the onerous weight, negative impact and slippery slope of this gesture? Well, it's your own, and I respect that, but it's a scant minority on the far end of the scale.
To address other concerns:
Regarding the Rick Rypien / Dan Snyder comparisons: Again a reminder that I made this comparison in direct response to an argument that attempted to disqualify the validity of the Dan Snyder remembrance under three explicit reasons:
* Snyder only played 50-odd games at the NHL level.
* Snyder never played a game for the Winnipeg Jets team, despite other historical involvement in the franchise.
* Snyder was a bit talent with no in-game significance as a player.
My entire counter-argument, and whole purpose for the comparison, was as follows:
* These factors also apply to Rick Rypien, who played about 2x as many NHL games but still 0 with the NHL franchise.
* These factors do not -- and should not -- disqualify us from remembering Rypien for what the story of his life represented to people in the franchise outside of the family.
* If these factors do not disqualify Rypien, they should not disqualify Snyder.
So far, the only opposition to this argument I've had is "Rick Rypien had closer out-of-game connections to the franchise". Yes, that explains why they are carrying on a traditional award and putting a little hidden patch inside a jersey for one, and do far, far more for the other. Doesn't address my argument one bit.
Regarding "treating Dan Snyder as a hero".
Again: *not once* have I said Dan Snyder was a hero. Not once. Nor has anyone else.
I've said he was by all accounts a really good person and a great teammate, and I don't think anyone disputes that.
Yes, in response to the first unfounded claim of "you called him a hero", I said "at best, he's a Rush-esque "Nobody's Hero"".
I guess to clarify for those unfamiliar for the song, it's about someone who *ISN'T* a hero, because they didn't do any of the grand things we'd associate with heroes ("Save a drowning child, cure a wasting disease," etc.) but was just a good person who made a difference to someone.
Plus, it's a great song and you should listen to it anyways.
His PARENTS, again -- their constant dedication to regrowth and renewal and forgiveness and grace and trying to make positive things happen from a tragedy? That borders on the super human, far better than some of the glib dismissals of it I've seen in this thread.
Whether you think 'heroic' could apply there is up to you; but their involvement are part of the story, and on whole, I think it's a net positive for our franchise to remain involved with it.
Some of you disagree? That's fine. It's what makes life worth living. I know full well that me living surrounded by people who think exactly like me and act exactly like me would be a living hell. Those of us of a parenting age who have had a lifetime of Spongebob Squarepants fed to us, and saw how Squidward suffered horribly in Tentacle Acres, will know *exactly* what I mean.