sipowicz
The thrill is gone
- Mar 16, 2011
- 31,822
- 41,740
I don't understand what this comment really means or refers to. What "hype?" You mean a bunch of inarguable statistical evidence that shows him to be a great goal-tender at pretty much every level throughout his career? That's not hype. That's looking at what he's actually done and saying "hey this guy could be something!" I mean what part of his past performance leads you to believe there's anything mis-leading about his potential?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he's a lock to be a great goalie in the NHL. I'm just saying that there's pretty valid reasons for thinking he might be that aren't just "hype."
Hype was probably the wrong hyperbole but hype seems to be used quite a bit around here as in: "Burmi is coming back from the KHL, he will be great, even better than before, new and improved" except there was no proof to back that up.
In Helly's case the guy was exceptional in college, great in the AHL and outstanding for the US at the world's. Oh and he had the numbers to prove it!
Hope that clears it up!
Last edited: