Pez68
Registered User
Imagine comparing Marner to Showtime.Show me all these videos of Patty Kane blowing guys up, and grinding for pucks in corners. I'll wait.
Imagine comparing Marner to Showtime.Show me all these videos of Patty Kane blowing guys up, and grinding for pucks in corners. I'll wait.
This management is not good enough. They say they want to win and will do anything blah blah blah but won't even provide any details in terms of an action plan. Just say that they are breaking up the Core 4 this summer and everyone has their answers.
Did you expect them to give you their entire offseason plans on an end of season presser? Of course you weren't going to get anything.
I don't know if Shanahan realize what he just said at the end there. He said that they have to assess the team at the end of this season. The reporter said well, why didn't you do this last year. He said they do it every year.
That makes this even worse. If the results of their assessment results in the same results one has to question either the methodology of the assessment and more to the point, whether the people doing the assessment are the right people for the job.
So imagine this mentality and culture permeating throughout the organization. No wonder the on ice product has remained stagnant.
They didn't provide more details because they're covering their own butts, in case Tavares and Marner won't waive their NMC and the Leafs end up having to ice the same roster next year with very minor changes.
Yes I agree with this, I'm just saying that the optics of firing a coach who's extension hasn't kicked in yet are...bad. Looks like mismanagement. But you are right and I agree this makes the Leafs a potentially more desirable destination to coach if you basically know that you'll get a few millions extra for free more than in another market if you are let go.They did it intentionally. The Leafs always extend coaches they're going to fire as a sort of severance pay. They treat their coaches well even when letting them go. Probably to make it more desireable for future coaches to want to coach there.
They did the exact same thing with Ron Wilson, Carlyle, etc. Basically every full-time coach that was on an expiring deal got a multi year extension right before they were fired.
This is a very interesting point and I did not clue in to that being an intentional/purposeful action. It does make sense though, since coaches are more at risk of being moved quickly - it's almost like negotiating a severance package ahead of time, at the point of hiring. I see this in corporate circles so it makes sense why they would do this to incentivize coaches to consider a particular team.They did it intentionally. The Leafs always extend coaches they're going to fire as a sort of severance pay. They treat their coaches well even when letting them go. Probably to make it more desireable for future coaches to want to coach there.
They did the exact same thing with Ron Wilson, Carlyle, etc. Basically every full-time coach that was on an expiring deal got a multi year extension right before they were fired.
that is f***ing insane! Keefe getting a job as any Head Coach, let alone a possible (recovery) contender like NJ?
I guess my own opinion of him is just much worse than some. As in, he's a zero, and why would any NHL org consider him for a head coach job? I sincerely hope this is smoke...
dang
leafs should sleepwalk to a cup next season if they were this good with such a bad head coach
Show me the videos of Marner scoring Stanley Cup winning goals and hoisting the Conn Smythe trophy. I'll wait.Show me all these videos of Patty Kane blowing guys up, and grinding for pucks in corners. I'll wait.
that is f***ing insane! Keefe getting a job as any Head Coach, let alone a possible (recovery) contender like NJ?
I guess my own opinion of him is just much worse than some. As in, he's a zero, and why would any NHL org consider him for a head coach job? I sincerely hope this is smoke...
It is fine and dandy that Shanahan says that he is accountable for the poor performance and the underwhelming results and it is "on me". But practically what does that mean? For me, in hearing this corporate speak coming from many executives in my lifetime, it is honestly empty words unless it is accompanied by action.Now Shanahan has to go since he's the real mastermind behind that nightmare.
He was right about being in love with Zach Hyman as well.
I remember Leafs fans complaining about him being on a line with Matthews.