Kane himself admitted in his own court statement that he was betting 50 times a day.
That's why the story doesn't add up at all.
Kane's post-trial brief laid out arguments to explain the Oilers winger's spiraling debt.
theathletic.com
Kane himself made a statement in a court of law that he was betting 50 times a day. It wasn't a third party statement.
Somehow though we're supposed to believe that Kane who had himself admitted to betting up to 50 times a day did nothing wrong but Shane Pinto should be handed a 41 game suspension that he himself won't even bother to appeal because "he didn't bet on NHL games"?
Yeah, I'm not buying it.