I mean coaches are not infallible beings, they're human and can make mistakes just like the rest of us. I don't think it's bad coaching more so than a coach having favorites and the player not looking out of place in their role. Jones looks the part of a #1 Dman - he skates well, has good mobility, a good shot, and has all the superlatives that describe a #1 D. The issue I have with him is that when you look at the results when he is on the ice it doesn't line up with what I see, that means I need to re-evaluate my opinion of him. When I look at EW's 2 models (GAR & xGAR), Micah's charts, and Jfresh's cards (he uses Patrick Bacon's model) and they all indicate a player that hasn't been great I tend to gravitate towards that being the truth. If you're interested there's a quick write up on
RAPM model's here, with a more
in-depth one here.
Perhaps Jones is playing too many minutes and it's impacting his ability to be effective, maybe there are other issues at the micro level that need to reviewed and improved upon and when corrected they'll help correct his issues at the macro level. But when you're talking about paying some big money I wouldn't want to risk it on someone that has been declining and may need a role adjustment.
It's not just one model that doesn't like him, it's 3 or 4 of the main public models. When there is that level of consensus about a player I think there should be some re-evaluation of that player. The player isn't inherently bad, but they haven't been generating positive results.
I don't understand how you can look at his declining numbers, both fancy and counting, and still suggest he is not only a #1 D, but a top 5 dman at that. He has that upside, but he hasn't played at that level since 2017-2018 which is a full 3 seasons ago. Would you be okay paying him 9-11M for 7 years? That's an enormous risk for someone that's current claim to fame is essentially being on the ice for a long time.