that is deffinitly a pipedream, never never happen soo moot point, just speculation in your part
A bold one-sided statement. A bit like a court decision. The verdict is delivered, the electric chair is ready to go.
In life, things are a little more complicated.
I'm not afraid to be wrong. I am not ashamed of this and am ready to admit my mistakes. In this case, I do not see an error.
(You can see that comment # 33 was not edited).
Here are some excerpts from my comment # 33:
“This deadline could bring one of the teams the Stanley Cup.
A greedy team could lose the Stanley Cup chances.
For example: Edmonton - Toronto series.
TOR
Palmieri (@ 50% Ret)
Savard (@ 50% Ret)
Foligno (@ 50% Ret)
Bernier (@ 50% Ret)
Other players from the list are possible”.
After I was asked: “
where is toronto going to find the money to fit those 3 under the cap even at 50% retained”
I answered this question in comment # 54 from a financial point of view.
Here are some excerpts from my comment # 54:
“The easiest option:
Kerfoot $ 3,500,000
Andersen $ 5,000,000
Total - $ 8,500,000
Palmieri (@ 50% Ret) - $4,650,000
Savard (@ 50% Ret) - $4,250,000
Foligno (@ 50% Ret) - $5,500,000
Bernier (@ 50% Ret) - $3,000,000
Total - (@ 50% Ret) - $ 8,700,000
The difference is $ 200,000.
Do you think this can be fixed?"
Now you are saying that this is unrealistic.
I will answer in terms of Toronto resources. It's easy for me.
They wrote to me that we need to keep two young players.
My guess is:
Nicholas Robertson and Rasmus Sandin.
If I'm wrong, just substitute your names.
The show begins!
Remember: Kerfoot and Andersen.
Toronto has:
Draft Picks: 1st, 2nd, 4th (2021) & 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th (2022).
Team Prospects:
Prospect A
Rodion Amirov
Prospects B:
Timothy Liljegren, Filip Hållander, Joey Anderson, Joseph Duszak, Alexander Barabanov, Mikhail Abramov….
There are others.
There is no need to argue about them.
Designation - Prospect A, B conditional.
TOR
Savard (@ 50% Ret)
Foligno (@ 50% Ret)
CBJ
Amirov+ Liljegren + Prospect B + Prospect B
TOR
Palmieri (@ 50% Ret)
NJD
1st 2022 + Prospect B + Prospect B.
TOR
Bernier (@ 50% Ret)
DET
1st 2021 + Prospect B + Prospect B + Kerfoot + Andersen
I didn't write draft picks: 2nd, 4th (2021) and 2nd, 3rd, 4th (2022).
This is a reserve. You can add to any transaction, or replace any part with them.
Each trade has a valuable asset: Amirov, 1st 2021, 1st 2022.
The compensation is approximate. This is a 75% deal template.
You can see that the deals are real.
Somewhere you can add, somewhere to subtract. Swap parts of the compensation.
Do I think this is the perfect deal for Toronto? Of course no.
In commentary # 33, I wrote:
“For example: Edmonton - Toronto series.
Other players from the list are possible.
The cost of some hockey players is too high”.
“For example” - Is there something incomprehensible here?
“Other players from the list are possible”. - Perhaps the phrase is difficult to understand?
I wrote in other comments that Toronto needs to be preserved:
Robertson, Sandin, Amirov, Liljegren.
Tried to trade the "face of the Toronto franchise" - Nylander !!!
Many cheaper exchanges for problem areas can be carried out.
I have repeatedly written that Toronto's main problem is the goalkeeper.
Including before the start of the season.
There are two disabled people at the gate.
Minimum requirements: G, D, LW, 3C.
I am writing a cheaper option
For example:
DET
Kerfoot
$ 3,500,000
1st, 2nd, 4th (2021).
Prospect B + Prospect B.
2nd (2022).
+???
TOR
Stecher $1,700,000 (@ 50% Ret)
Bernier $3,000,000 (@ 50% Ret)
Glendening $1,800,000 (@ 50% Ret)
Ryan $1,000,000
Total:
$ 4,250,000
The difference is
$ 750,000
Capfriendly - TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS projected cap space:
$ 485,162
I hope I don't need to explain how the
$ 264,838 can be compensated.
Remaining in the team: Robertson, Sandin, Amirov, Liljegren.
Hopefully there are no questions popping up here.
Other players from the list are possible.
The exchange can be with other clubs !!!
The deal may include - Andersen $ 5,000,000
The amount of compensation is approximate. It is necessary to show that it exists.
I wrote
“Perhaps will strengthen the position of Kyle Dubas”
If you do not agree that deals are possible - argue this.
I wrote
“COVID-19 has brought big changes”
You wrote
"this is definitely a pipe dream, it will never happen like this ...".
I may ask with the data, for what period of time do you locate?
Interested in the actions of general managers of NHL teams in the context of COVID-19.
In the face of problems with the salary ceiling.
How many deadlines do you cite as an example? Maybe five, ten?
Good luck to you.
You have read a very long comment.
I wonder if I have set a record on the forum? Thanks to everyone who did not give up and read to the end. This comment had a specific purpose. I want to use it as an example and template.
When I write seriously, I try to take into account the financial aspects and the capabilities of the teams in the proposed transactions. I will copy the link to this page and use it if necessary. I don't have the opportunity to write such a novel every time.
Good luck to everyone who has read this book.