Sens/Pens Game 7 is 2017: One of the most consequential games in NHL history?

KennethMelvin

Registered User
Mar 27, 2019
1
0
Think about it. For one franchise; it was the climax of an improbable run that led to their complete demise as a competitive franchise. For the other, cemented the legacy of one of the greatest players of all time whilst coming closer to achieving the unthinkable in a Cap era; back to back Cups.
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
9,598
5,214
Considering how close Penguins & Detroit got to do a back to back and the BlackHawks level of sustained success and winning 3 cups in 5 year's + reaching round 3 I am not sure people considered back to back to be unthinkable in the cap era.
 
  • Like
Reactions: feffan

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
25,990
5,850
Visit site
Not sure it was the most consequential game of that season. Noone expected the Sens to make that run and I don't think there was huge expectations they would necessarily build on that. Not sure how that loss lead to their demise in any context.

For the Pens, it would have been a pretty major upset and a huge missed opportunity if they loss. Game 7 against the Caps was more consequential IMO.

There is something to be said about the back-to-back though. What was once happening almost 50% of the time (a team repeating) from 1947 to 1992, has happened only twice in the last 25 years.
 

Big Phil

Registered User
Nov 2, 2003
31,703
4,148
I think that was a huge game. I mean, we were a goal away from an Ottawa/Nashville Cup final. Oh to see Gary Bettman's reaction to that one!

I was rooting for the Pens in 2017. There were moments on the ice during that spring where the Pens looked less than impressive but it almost always was after a hard fought series. Game 1 vs. Ottawa they looked flat, Game 1 and 2 vs. Nashville they looked awful but won both games. Eventually they came around and would outscore the Predators 8-0 the final two games. This was always after a hard fought 7 game series and their defense was being held by a string. You really saw how they missed the minute muncher in Letang. Justin Schultz is a decent defenseman, but he shouldn't be your #1 guy. It just goes to show you how well Crosby and Malkin carried them that year. You can argue this is Crosby's finest moment.

I just wanted to see two in a row again, it had been 19 years. Why not? Other sports had done it, even multiple times, since then. Why not see a good flagship team that every one wants to beat? The thing I remember about the overtimes in Game 7 was just how much Pittsburgh was dominating the Sens. Maybe the Sens had a decent scoring chance, but I can't remember it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trade

MXD

Original #4
Oct 27, 2005
50,829
16,564
If you were paying attention back then, or just wasn't a blind Sens fan drinking the kool-aid, you'd already knew that the Senators shouldn't even have been close to making the playoffs; thus, them floundering in 17-18 wasn't that surprising... Hell, it was probably even expected.

Someone should probably have told the Sens brass that you shouldn't drink the kool-aid you're making though.
 

c9777666

Registered User
Aug 31, 2016
19,892
5,876
I think that was a huge game. I mean, we were a goal away from an Ottawa/Nashville Cup final. Oh to see Gary Bettman's reaction to that one!

I was rooting for the Pens in 2017. There were moments on the ice during that spring where the Pens looked less than impressive but it almost always was after a hard fought series. Game 1 vs. Ottawa they looked flat, Game 1 and 2 vs. Nashville they looked awful but won both games. Eventually they came around and would outscore the Predators 8-0 the final two games. This was always after a hard fought 7 game series and their defense was being held by a string. You really saw how they missed the minute muncher in Letang. Justin Schultz is a decent defenseman, but he shouldn't be your #1 guy. It just goes to show you how well Crosby and Malkin carried them that year. You can argue this is Crosby's finest moment.

I just wanted to see two in a row again, it had been 19 years. Why not? Other sports had done it, even multiple times, since then. Why not see a good flagship team that every one wants to beat? The thing I remember about the overtimes in Game 7 was just how much Pittsburgh was dominating the Sens. Maybe the Sens had a decent scoring chance, but I can't remember it.

IMHO, PIT had won enough by 2017. OTT was a nice cinderella story. Plus, sometimes it's more fun to see the flagship team lose.

The fact no team had repeated was a cool quirk. Now, it's just 'Oh, PIT repeats again. Yay.'
 

Big Phil

Registered User
Nov 2, 2003
31,703
4,148
IMHO, PIT had won enough by 2017. OTT was a nice cinderella story. Plus, sometimes it's more fun to see the flagship team lose.

The fact no team had repeated was a cool quirk. Now, it's just 'Oh, PIT repeats again. Yay.'

I mean, it only happened twice in 20 years so I don't think it is a novelty that has worn off or anything. Before Pittsburgh did it we are talking two decades here.
 

tony d

New poll series coming from me on June 3
Jun 23, 2007
76,597
4,556
Behind A Tree
That was quite the run for this former Sens fan. Got to think if they reach the Cup final they beat Nashville as well. A Cup win probably keeps Karlsson there long-term and prevents what has happened the past 2 years to the team from happening.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad