Seahawks are still a couple of O-line pieces away from being a serious contender.
Does your opinion change based on the amount NYG is eating of the remaining $10 mill cap charges due on his base salary? He's a $1 mill per week charge. So, if the Giants eat half or more of that, it's under $5 mill for Seattle. Honestly, I can't ever really gauge NFL trades. Byard for a 5th and 6th. Some positions are premium, so you have to give up for them. Plus, contract status and cap hits are important considerations.Getting Abe Lucas back will be a big help.
This trade will help the Hawks, even if I think a second rounder is a pretty steep price.
Does your opinion change based on the amount NYG is eating of the remaining $10 mill cap charges due on his base salary? He's a $1 mill per week charge. So, if the Giants eat half or more of that, it's under $5 mill for Seattle. Honestly, I can't ever really gauge NFL trades. Byard for a 5th and 6th. Some positions are premium, so you have to give up for them. Plus, contract status and cap hits are important considerations.
As for the OL, their starting group was to be Cross, Haynes, Brown, Lewis, and Lucas. But, they have had to use their 2 mid round picks Oluwatemi at C and sometimes at C, plus Bradford at Guard. And have had to dip into off the couch Peters at 41 to fill at RT.
Easier to give up the #2 when Seattle owns Denver's 3rd which should be in the top 10 of round 3. Seattle's 2nd likely in the bottom 10 or so of round 2. For that difference, (I'm assuming Seattle tried to only give up a #3, either Denver's or theirs), but to secure that cap space, probably worth the extra 15 or so draft positions.I was already pretty good with it. The amount of retention was necessary for SEA to even make the trade, far as I know and cost them a higher pick. The help up front will be welcome, though.