I love hags dont get me wrong.
But
Hags, Sheary, Brassard or Sheahan out
Tavares in
Profit
Why would the Islanders want Kessel? He's good, but they aren't one good winger away from a dangerous team, especially if they lose tavares.
Why would the Islanders want Kessel? He's good, but they aren't one good winger away from a dangerous team, especially if they lose tavares.
Let's be real, there's no way that would actually fly. If Tavares would hit free agency, I really doubt he'd come to the Penguins. It would almost definitely have to be a sign and trade, and the Penguins only have Kessel as a guy they can trade that clears out that much salary. Teams aren't going to line up to take Hagelin or Sheary so the Penguins can afford Tavares. I would also rather only lose 1 player rather than 3 personally, I'd rather have Hagelin and Brassard over Kessel.
Because in this case, it's Kessel or lose Tavares in free agency for nothing. A Barzal-Kessel duo is also pretty sick, and getting Kessel in helps alleviate the pain of losing Tavares a good amount. The Islanders have issues on defense and in net, at least getting Kessel while losing Tavares helps their offense not become garbage.
Why wouldn’t the Islanders, who are terrible on D, prefer Letang? If they’re doing a sign and trade, they’d more likely ask for Letang, which some people on this board would be thrilled about....
Why would the Islanders want Kessel? He's good, but they aren't one good winger away from a dangerous team, especially if they lose tavares.
Why wouldn’t the Islanders, who are terrible on D, prefer Letang? If they’re doing a sign and trade, they’d more likely ask for Letang, which some people on this board would be thrilled about....
You're asking the wrong question.
Why would the Phil waive his 8 team list - which almost certainly doesn't include Islanders - in order to go there?
I think it depends on how Kessel configures his NTC. In Toronto, I think he didn't want to leave Toronto, so he made his NTC teams that wouldn't be able to trade for him. Has he been in Pittsburgh long enough to not want to move elsewhere? I don't think we can really easily say. The safe bet is probably no, he wouldn't waive for the Islanders. I don't know who he would waive for, though.
Its a good question but in this case, I'd assume his list would be all contenders at the very least - which is probably no for the Islanders.
Came in here to see if people are talking about Grabner, JvR maybe even James Neal and people are talking about Tavares as a 3C?! Are you guys nuts?!
Friedman suggested it and we're just having a discussion based on that. It's very unlikely, but it's theoretically possible.
Came in here to see if people are talking about Grabner, JvR maybe even James Neal and people are talking about Tavares as a 3C?! Are you guys nuts?!
Came in here to see if people are talking about Grabner, JvR maybe even James Neal and people are talking about Tavares as a 3C?! Are you guys nuts?!
Higher Cap minus Hunwick and, possibly, minus Sheary would allow quite a bit of cap room.I'd add... that while this is nuts and based on nothing that Friedman's hot air...
Tavares is less nuts than Grabner/JvR/Neal.
We don't have the cap to add a big name winger without sending out a fair amount and we've also got a pretty full roster there. JvR and Neal don't really change things enough there to be worth the hassle of changing that.
We do have the cap to add a decent bottom 6 winger, but Grabner seems wedded to New York.
Tavares on the other hand, seems wedded to nowhere and is good enough that he is worth the hassle of rearranging things. You can never have enough talent like Tavares.
You're asking the wrong question.
Why would the Phil waive his 8 team list - which almost certainly doesn't include Islanders - in order to go.
Now, if the Islanders trade Tavares for Kessel, their issue will be that their center depth is crappy. Their winger depth would be absurd, and if you still think that Kessel can carry a line like he used to in Toronto, their offense would still be pretty good. Their top-9 winger group would look something like:
Lee--Eberle
Ladd--Kessel
Beauvillier--Bailey
That's a really good group, considering that they'd have at least a 59 point player from the previous year on their 3rd line (Eberle had 59 points, Bailey had 71 points and Kessel had 92 points), the problem is that they have no top-9 centers after Barzal. However, they also have a ton of cap space. With Kessel, they have about $30 million in cap space with 9 forwards, 4 D and a goalie under contract. If they could throw a bunch of money at someone like Bozak or Statsny (they might even have enough money to do both), I could see their forward group without Tavares being really good. Let's go high and say that Statsny is going to cost $7 million, they would have:
Lee-Barzal-Eberle
Beauvillier-Statsny-Bailey
Ladd-Cizikas-Kessel
XXXX-XXXX-Clutterbuck
They'd still have about $20 million in cap space if the cap ends up being $80 million.
Why are the Penguins, who are terrible on D, want to trade Letang for another center?
Higher Cap minus Hunwick and, possibly, minus Sheary would allow quite a bit of cap room.
The scenario I was referring to was trading Tavares for Kessel, otherwise Id agree with you.If they Islanders get a goalie and resign Tavares and off load some of their crap like Clutterbuck, I could see them being really good.
I apologize for any eyeballs I burn out of their sockets.
It was just too good not to share when I ran into it.
Something needs to be done about the D. I could see if we didnt have the 4th highest paid blueline in the league, but we shouldnt have these issues with these guys getting paid that much.
Is it the players? Or is it the system ?
Do we need to go out and get faster dmen who can move the puck(and able to get back to prevent odd man rushes)? Make a trade?
These are things JR has to figure out. No reason we should have a problem on D with them taking up that much cap room.
I apologize for any eyeballs I burn out of their sockets.
It was just too good not to share when I ran into it.