Good win. I was sick of all the losing.
Win, and win some more.
Win, and win some more.
Refreshing to hear them actually tell the truth. Dunleavy is unbearableFor road calls, LA seems like a very good crew regularly.
You directly stated that Girgensons being down was great because it means more ice time for good players, specifically in reference to the Cozens line that had been scoring (look up scoring as you do not know what it means hurf durf). Hence my mention of 11 players etc. You are pinballing between supportive points as I've already pointed out. I've already addressed every point you've made.You're in a field of your own strawmen. I never said a word about playing down a man being a normative good (look up normative good as you do not know what it means). I said being down Gus was great tonight, and it would be better if he retired. I guess you assume the Sabres would choose to not field another player in the event Gus retired. Again, that's all on you.
Keep scrambling. It's fun to watch.
Doughty is a total fanny.Tage not happy. Doughty went low.
Like I said, you have NO IDEA what normative good means. None whatsoever. You're, literally, battling yourself because I don't like your favorite Sabre.You directly stated that Girgensons being down was great because it means more ice time for good players, specifically in reference to the Cozens line that had been scoring (look up scoring as you do not know what it means hurf durf). Hence my mention of 11 players etc. You are pinballing between supportive points as I've already pointed out. I've already addressed every point you've made.
No one is going to change their opinion because the Sabres won tonight.And now??!! What's the point of winning if they lose again at home? Now people are happy and this idiot Adams sees his defensive stance confirmed again. It's a joke franchise. The idiots go around in circles and don't notice
i am never cheering for losses againQuestion: Are people happy we came back and won the game, or would we rather have been blown out in the hopes it causes change?
Uh huh. This is all simple. You implied they tied it because Girgensons is so bad this his absence is good. I said his absence didn't lead to goals (at that time) because those scorers play with each other, not Girgensons. You said Girgensons being gone led to more ice time for them. That is no longer about Girgensons being bad or good, rather that it's good for that line (which had been bad before tonight) to get more ice time. Two totally different arguments. Then Tuch scored which you can use to support the Zemgus Bad argument, so you now only want to focus on that. I mean, yeah, obviously Tuch is better than Zemgus offensively. If we could trade him for another Tuch then by all means.Like I said, you have NO IDEA what normative good means. None whatsoever. You're, literally, battling yourself because I don't like your favorite Sabre.
You're like watching a professional dancer. Maybe that could be Gus's new career! I hear softies make good dancers.Uh huh. This is all simple. You implied they tied it because Girgensons is so bad this his absence is good. I said his absence didn't lead to goals (at that time) because those scorers play with each other, not Girgensons. You said Girgensons being gone led to more ice time for them. That is no longer about Girgensons being bad or good, rather that it's good for that line (which had been bad before tonight) to get more ice time. Two totally different arguments. Then Tuch scored which you can use to support the Zemgus Bad argument, so you now only want to focus on that. I mean, yeah, obviously Tuch is better than Zemgus offensively. If we could trade him for another Tuch then by all means.
Not us fans, but coaching staff, general manager, owner, the players...etc do that. Please read what i writeNo one is going to change their opinion because the Sabres won tonight.
Does anybody actually believe that Pegula, Adams, or Granato are going to change anything this season?Question: Are people happy we came back and won the game, or would we rather have been blown out in the hopes it causes change?
You got me.You're like watching a professional dancer. Maybe that could be Gus's new career! I hear softies make good dancers.
Like I said, no one is going to change their minds about anything just because the Sabres won tonight. Surprisingly this isn't their first win of the season.Not us fans, but coaching staff, general manager, owner, the players...etc do that. Please read what i write
Shockingly, they also accounted for 51 goals in 67 games! Those were the days.His rookie year in Rochester, he was on a line that had almost had 1000 PIM as a trio (Kevin Kerr, Scott Metcalfe and Ray). Absolute insanity.
Again...read what I wroteYou got me.
Like I said, no one is going to change their minds about anything just because the Sabres won tonight. Surprisingly this isn't their first win of the season.
Just read it the fourth time. You wanna tell me what I'm missing?Again...read what I wrote
I have to... show me where I write that the fans' opinion has now changedJust read it the fourth time. You wanna tell me what I'm missing?
I didn't say anything about fansI have to... show me where I write that the fans' opinion has now changed
I live in LA and the guys in the booth are very solid. You're always gonna have a little bias for the home team, but Nickson and Fox have been pros for a long time and it's never the clown show it often is in other markets.For road calls, LA seems like a very good crew regularly.
And Bob Miller was one of the GOATs.I live in LA and the guys in the booth are very solid. You're always gonna have a little bias for the home team, but Nickson and Fox have been pros for a long time and it's never the clown show it often is in other markets.
No one is going to change their opinion because the Sabres won tonight.
I didn't say anything about fans