Definitely. They had nearly identical points, same age, with one being capable of potentially moving up the lineup, bringing physicality and a playoff demeanour -- while the other is a 4C. Kostin could realistically play anywhere on our left side, McLeod is nothing more than a 4C.
When two players produce the same amount of points we should start to look at things like playoff production, physicality, intangibles. Kostin is a guy who will fight and hit and talk shit. McLeod is a wallflower who wilts, hiding along the outsides of the rink.
Kostin played far less minutes, put up the same points, and provides far more intangibles to a group, while thriving in playoff hockey. It's not close.
I love how you can go from saying he isn't overpaid to saying he has no value in the span of two sentences.