guymez
The Seldom Seen Kid
- Mar 3, 2004
- 33,245
- 13,090
Gagner looks like he's $17K less this year and $33K more next year, so pretty negligible.
Thank for that.
Gagner looks like he's $17K less this year and $33K more next year, so pretty negligible.
So just under $2M in cap savings. That would have been a benefit for this team for sure.
One less contract too.
He had his flaws here for sure, but he was working hard at reinventing himself into a 3rd line centre and by all accounts was a really good teammate. He also had some success in New York to end the year.Just watching the legend of Ryan strome grow into a fringe hall of famer
Just watching the legend of Ryan strome grow into a fringe hall of famer
Only Peter Chiarelli could manage to lose two trades involving the same player.Now that's one hell of a strawman. The problem people have with that trade is pretty simple.
Strome is an NHL player. Spooner is not.
If it came across sarcastic, that wasn't my intent, I was curious how the numbers differed.Thank for that.
Happy Lucic bonus day everyone!
Pretty cool you know these guys personally
If it came across sarcastic, that wasn't my intent, I was curious how the numbers differed.
The 2 things I left thinking, that Gagner can contribute at the NHL level and Spooner is no longer an NHL player.
Your seriously still asking this? All D men on the Edmonton Oilers saw time with Mcdavid.
He had the beat GF/GA numbers of the top 4 D. So Russell some special boost that Klefbom isn’t? It’s not advantage when everybody gets it.
Plus I already pointed out his numbers this year are right on par with his 791 game career which includes hundreds of games without Mcdavid.
Agreed with Strome, I wonder if you didn't weight him down with Lucic for a long period of time would it work better (obviously), but we really won't know.No worries. I didnt take it that way (sarcastically) at all.
I like Gagner...upgrade on Spooner for sure.
I think ultimately though (given a choice) I would rather have Strome just because he is a natural center and the team has a glut of bottom 6 wingers that are a lot cheaper than Gagner.
I strongly suspect that there will be more action between now and when the puck drops than in a typical year. Too many teams are experiencing cap issues that are going to have to be resolved.I think there is kinda a lull in the market in terms of trades and signings due to the RFA's that are still yet to sign. With the way the contacts are going most of them are going to be pretty high contracts.
Agreed with Strome, I wonder if you didn't weight him down with Lucic for a long period of time would it work better (obviously), but we really won't know.
As far as Gagner's cap hit, I still think you could possibly flip him back to the Jackets.
Tons of Cap space, he had a lot of success there not so long ago and he would come (probably with a little asset) for not much cost., they also might be able to make use of his offense given all that's left.Gagner to the Jackets...just curious...what makes you think thats a possibility?
Tons of Cap space, he had a lot of success there not so long ago and he would come (probably with a little asset) for not much cost., they also might be able to make use of his offense given all that's left.
I could see a Gagner and 4th for Sedlak (signed in the KHL)
Edit: Maybe you could even make it creative and move Gagner for Nash (basically), as Nash was real bad for them last year.
At this point it seems that the buyout was pretty unnecessary and we could've kept him for this seasonSo, do you think the Sekera buyout will end up being useful or was it done to sign fringe NHLers?
It has given the team some flexibility. I wish it was Russell, but Russell has been healthier and his buyout has a $3.4M cap hit next season.So, do you think the Sekera buyout will end up being useful or was it done to sign fringe NHLers?
Could be part of it, but the drop was pretty dramatic, 12 pts in 2 more gamesInteresting.
In terms of Nash I find it really odd that his. ice time was cut by almost 5 minutes last season. Thats a lot. Could be that Columbus has more forward depth than Boston but thats a huge drop.
Something appears to be going on there.
So, do you think the Sekera buyout will end up being useful or was it done to sign fringe NHLers?
Unless we make a major move, it looks like it was simply for cap flexibility and to sign all the bottom 6ers on the market.So, do you think the Sekera buyout will end up being useful or was it done to sign fringe NHLers?
Could be part of it, but the drop was pretty dramatic, 12 pts in 2 more games
Nash might not have been a fit, which we've all seen can happen.