TheDevilMadeMe
Registered User
Horton and Stanley as a duo were vastly superior than the individual talents might suggest. In the playoffs their offensive talents were nearly equal. Stanley 43 points in 109 games while Horton registered 50 points in 126 games. Very marginal edge to Horton. Mainly due to 1962. .
Two key considerations.
From 1957 to 1967 Stanley`s teams made the SC finals 8 out of 11 seasons. Hurt , missed the 1957 playoffs. 1958 Bruins with Stanley gave the Canadiens their strongest opposition between 1956 and 1960.
Gordie Howe. Was Stanley`s main responsibility coming down the RW.
Let's be careful not to straight up Cup count when it comes to Allan Stanley. In Boston, from what I've read, Fleming MacKell and Fern Flaman were considered the most important players when they reached the Cup finals (which of course only required winning a single round at the time). Do you disagree?
And on Toronto's dynasty, Stanley was definitely important, but he was the 3rd most important defenseman behind Horton and Brewer, right? (Not saying anything about the forwards). Or do you believe his role was more important than Brewer's in the playoffs?
___________________
In terms of offensive stats, it depends on whether you like Stanley consistently chipping in points, or Horton putting up two big runs, with fewer points in between.
Horton's first huge run - 1962 when he led the Leafs to their first Cup in over a decade with 16 points in 12 games. Horton was easily the MVP of that Cup winner. The Conn Smythe trophy didn't exist yet, but it's obvious that if it did, it would have been won by either Horton or Mikita (who set an NHL record for points in the playoffs, in a losing cause).
His second big run wasn't as huge, but was still important - 1967, when an aging Leafs team had their last hurrah. Horton had 8 points in 12 games, tied for 4th on the team and 7th in the league.