Chicago can’t even ice a full squad tonight because of cap considerations. Maybe there’s an opportunity here.
Chicago can’t even ice a full squad tonight because of cap considerations. Maybe there’s an opportunity here.
I'm sure plenty will disagree, but I'm happy that Lias was viewed as too high of an ask from the Rangers perspective in a Puljujarvi trade.
Don't need LHD, at all either... unless you can get someone who profiles a true difference maker. They're more than set with guys who project as "comfortably top 4" and below.I think they'd still be open to adding the right center, the question is whether the right center will be available.
I think Zibanejad and Chytil have eased some of those concerns over the last 6-8 months. But I also think as the roster takes shape, it becomes easier to really get a grasp on emerging needs and priorities.
The Rangers could probably use more of everything other than RHDs and goalies at the moment. But if you were to rank them, I don't think center is at the top of the list anymore. At least not to the extent it arguably is on our board.
What report said this?I don't think that was why it was considered too high. The report said that Edmonton also wanted a first rounder. The deal on the table was Andersson + 1st round pick for Puljujarvi. I believe the rangers only wanted to do a straight up deal.
With the way we’re set up now we could really have used a talented winger like JP too. Fast could move to the 4th line. He’s iffy for tonight and that messes things up.
Friggen kravtsov idiot that he is 6 weeks in the A and he’d have been back here no doubt in my mind
Holland is aiming high but I'd literally laugh him off the phone if I was running the RangersI don't think that was why it was considered too high. The report said that Edmonton also wanted a first rounder. The deal on the table was Andersson + 1st round pick for Puljujarvi. I believe the rangers only wanted to do a straight up deal.
Chicago can’t even ice a full squad tonight because of cap considerations. Maybe there’s an opportunity here.
We aren't even close to the half way point yet and they can't call up anyone?
you're right, but they don't have a lot coming off next season and Dylan Strome is a pending RFA. Maybe a deal could be had there.I'm not seeing a match there. Looking at their players with significant cap hits, I can't see any who we would want long term, and I can't see any who would work as cap dumps, as most of them have another year or more on their contract.
Well then...
Don't need LHD, at all either... unless you can get someone who profiles a true difference maker. They're more than set with guys who project as "comfortably top 4" and below.
I don't think that was why it was considered too high. The report said that Edmonton also wanted a first rounder. The deal on the table was Andersson + 1st round pick for Puljujarvi. I believe the rangers only wanted to do a straight up deal.
Deep Skate conspiracyThere will still be some believing he did
There will still be some believing he did
What report said this?I don't think that was why it was considered too high. The report said that Edmonton also wanted a first rounder. The deal on the table was Andersson + 1st round pick for Puljujarvi. I believe the rangers only wanted to do a straight up deal.
I still think Rykov could be a NHL player. Robertson and Miller as top4 candidates. Skjei and Lindgren seem solid for now. Jones might even make a push. I think our defense is 'set', for lack of a better word, moving forward. That's not to say we couldn't use a top2 defender.Personally, I'd argue that they need need some higher-end skill on that left side, or someone who sets the table and let's other players slide in behind them.
I think we have a good plethora of support players, but I'd like a little more of a cross-section there.
I think we have safer, simpler guys on the left side. And more longer-term guys who have more unique skill sets. But I'd like some options that kind of split the difference a little.
Right now, on the right side, we're debating who stays and goes among Trouba, ADA, Fox, Lundkvist and even Keane. We can arguably take one guy out of the equation and be relatively okay.
On the left side, if we take Miller off the table, it changes the dynamic substantially.
I thought I had saw it somewhere on twitter but now I can't find it. Maybe I was imagining things. lolWhat report said this?
MAYBE it was so bad, he forgotIt's a conspiracy and a cover-up!
Zibanejad CLEARLY had a concussion.
MAYBE it was so bad, he forgot
The Rangers have the highest scoring defense in the league. Why screw with that right now? Lundkvist could get traded for an impact player at another position. Anyone note the Brewers-Padres baseball trade last week? Two excellent young players traded because the puzzles didn’t fit right? Rangers could find a similar partner (Anaheim?)