Rank Kirby Dach in draft 2022

[KevSkillz4]

Already 20 points in 29 games, he have great protection of puck, great hands and great passing ability.

Habs trade 13th overall pick in 2022 draft to acquire Kirby Dach.

Rank Kirby Dach in this draft, if he has been drafted in that year.

Actual top 5 is:

#1 - Slafkovsky.
#2 - Nemec.
#3 - Cooley.
#4 - Wright.
#5 - Gauthier.

Click to read more...

 

[LaMasquerade]

Quite hard question, really.. he is already playing his 4th season while the 2022 draftees are still mostly in lower leagues. I haven't seen anything top 10 worthy yet, but he's not a total disaster either.. so, I'd say 16-20 or 21-25.

 

[amnesiac]

too early to know how to compare a bunch of 18 year olds

 

[HugeInTheShire]

Somebody wants people to notice Dach is having a good year.

 

[Xspyrit]

Why compare to the 2022 draft? Of course it's way too early. Even 2020 would be too early

He's 4th in pts from the 2019 draft, just do the re-draft instead

Somebody wants people to notice Dach is having a good year.

1 goal 2 assists in last 9 games, almost 20 mins per game

313th in xGF/60 among 552 forwards who played at least 200 mins at ES

43.13 xGF% at ES, playing mostly with Montreal's 2 best forwards

Should be a better player than Josh Anderson

 

[the paisanos guy]

might be the strangest poll I've seen

 

[Mrb1p]

Somebody wants people to notice Dach is having a good year.

Hes not even having that good of a year, hes just playing with two superstars.

 

[Golden_Jet]

Why would you do that against players. Just drafted, with a player drafted 3 years ago. Can’t you do that with other players from 2019 draft, maybe Zegras, or others.

 

[The Crypto Guy]

We are ranking a guy 3 years older than everyone else in a draft class? Why?

 

[Ezekial]

This thread is what the kids call "sus"

 

[WhiskeyYerTheDevils]

Hes not even having that good of a year, hes just playing with two superstars.

Suzuki and Caufield are two good young players but they aren't superstars. They are 32nd and 72nd in league scoring while getting completely dominated in terms of expected goals.

 

[Mrb1p]

Suzuki and Caufield are two good young players but they aren't superstars. They are 32nd and 72nd in league scoring while getting completely dominated in terms of expected goals.

If you dont have time to watch them you can just say this instead of relying on very random numbers.

 

[PoutineSp00nZ]

Lets rank a guy who has had several pro years to a bunch of teenagers, most of whom haven't played a game in the NHL.

Seems legit.

 

[Xspyrit]

Hes not even having that good of a year, hes just playing with two superstars.

What is your definition of "superstar"?

Suzuki and Caufield are two good young players but they aren't superstars. They are 32nd and 72nd in league scoring while getting completely dominated in terms of expected goals.

Ok I am not crazy (or at least, I'm not alone in being crazy!)

If you dont have time to watch them you can just say this instead of relying on very random numbers.

Wuuuut? Your takes are always so "random"

 

[WhiskeyYerTheDevils]

If you dont have time to watch them you can just say this instead of relying on very random numbers.

I've watched them. They're not superstars. You're just a homer.

 

[Mrb1p]

I've watched them. They're not superstars. You're just a homer.

Theyre both top 15 at their position, thats superstar for me.

 

[majormajor]

Lets rank a guy who has had several pro years to a bunch of teenagers, most of whom haven't played a game in the NHL.

Seems legit.

It's a fair question.

If someone asks you if you'd rather have a hotdog, a sandwich, or a massage, do you interject "one of those is not a food!". No, you just pick what you'd rather have.

 

[Mrb1p]

What is your definition of "superstar"?



Ok I am not crazy (or at least, I'm not alone in being crazy!)



Wuuuut? Your takes are always so "random"

Top 10-15 at their position more or less. Suzuki could be anywhere from 5-15, Caufield anywhere from 5-10.

 

[Dirty Dog]

Theyre both top 15 at their position, thats superstar for me.

How many superstars do you have in the league then? 75?

Top 10-15 at their position more or less. Suzuki could be anywhere from 5-15, Caufield anywhere from 5-10.

What position is Suzuki #5 at…?

 

[Mrb1p]

How many superstars do you have in the league then? 75?



What position is Suzuki #5 at…?

McDavid, Crosby, Thompson, Hughes, Matthews and Mackinnon ? I guess 6-15, anywhere from there. Unless I missed someone head and shoulders better, I don't think so.

I think the league can sustain 15-25 superstars, mostly at F.

 

[BostonBob]

Somebody wants people to notice Dach is having a good year.

Somebody wants people to notice that a player on their favorite team is having a good year. Around here we call that " Torontoitis ".

 

[Dirty Dog]

McDavid, Crosby, Thompson, Hughes, Matthews and Mackinnon ? I guess 6-15, anywhere from there. Unless I missed someone head and shoulders better, I don't think so.

I think the league can sustain 15-25 superstars, mostly at F.

Fair enough! I have them both as key franchise players, so it’s all semantics

 

[WhiskeyYerTheDevils]

Theyre both top 15 at their position, thats superstar for me.

No they aren't.

Top 10-15 at their position more or less. Suzuki could be anywhere from 5-15, Caufield anywhere from 5-10.

Dear god you're a brutal homer.

 

[Mrb1p]

No they aren't.

Dear god you're a brutal homer.

okay

Theres currently 9 players on pace for 50 goals.

Cole Caufield is one of them and he has the 3rd worst shooting percentage.

What is that if not for a star player ?

 

[Hale The Villain]

In the 20-30 range one spot above Slafkovsky