Euge is the annoying uncle who musses up your hair and tells off colour jokes - but at least you know you're leaving thanksgiving dinner without any bruises in the end.
I'm talking more around Katz touring Seattle and things of that nature. As long as there's a demand for hockey these guys have each of their cities by the balls and they know it. Melnyk's managed to keep his evil-doings in Ottawa on a small potatos scale - not sure if we can look forward to the same once 'big' money is pumped into the team.
Euge is the annoying uncle who musses up your hair and tells off colour jokes - but at least you know you're leaving thanksgiving dinner without any bruises in the end.
Sell the team to who??? Hard to find a new owner who wants to take on a team that struggles to make money.
Yes it sucks that he is the owner but if this team is sold, it's also relocating. Be careful what you wish for.
SenateReform, that's Murray's job to decide where to spend the money on not ours. That's why he gets paid to be the GM. Give him the ability to spend to the cap and then you'll see the team improve very likely. I'd be blaming this mostly on Murray if we were spending to the cap and were where we are in the standings today.
Alfie did leave mostly because of the money. He was getting paid only 1 million last season to play and there was a backdoor agreement that Melnyk/Murray would compensate him on the new deal. Technically Murray couldn't give Alfie a blank cheque because Melnyk clearly told him there was a limit to how much you could resign Alfie for. If Melnyk said Bryan do whatever the hell it takes to sign him and I'll pay no matter what then Alfie would still be on our team today.
As for the leafs they have rich enough owners they can afford to buyout Clarkson whenever they want and not hurt them severely like it would for us. They'll have no problems keeping Kadri/Rielly because they can afford to spend to the cap year after year regardless of how high the cap is. People mock the leafs ownership but I'd take Bell/Rogers over Melnyk any day of the week. At least with them owning the team Murray wouldn't be handcuffed with an internal budget.
If you cannot commit to ensuring that this club remains reasonably competitive both on the ice as well as in the boardroom, then maybe it is time to start looking into identifying and starting a dialogue with parties who will. I understand that we will never be able to compete financially with the Torontos and the New Yorks of the league, but as it is, we are not able to compete with the Anaheims, the Winnipegs, or the Carolinas, either. We are not asking you to go bankrupt by making this a top-5 spending team, but we are telling you that we will not suffer a reprise of the "Rod Bryden years" lightly. We are sick of the mixed messages, the seemingly bi-polar nature of our PR department as it regards to our future, and the constant vague threats about the viability of the team.
....stop going to the games......he will sell. we have to make it clear we love our players and our team some how but we will no longer support this cheapskate owner......i will not buy another ticket this season.....unless we make the playoffs.....and even then....ill travel for games in t.o. mon. or det....
As for the leafs they have rich enough owners they can afford to buyout Clarkson whenever they want and not hurt them severely like it would for us. They'll have no problems keeping Kadri/Rielly because they can afford to spend to the cap year after year regardless of how high the cap is. People mock the leafs ownership but I'd take Bell/Rogers over Melnyk any day of the week. At least with them owning the team Murray wouldn't be handcuffed with an internal budget.
This is very important to reiterate. I think some people are under the impression that we want Melnyk to be a Top 5 spender when that just isn't the case. What I want to ensure is that we're making good financial decisions but also not handcuffing the team with an internal budget.
make no mistake, we want you here if you are as committed to winning as you sometimes claim to be.
-some BuddhistIt is a human tendency to blame others before reflecting on oneself. But if you do, you will never find the real cause of the problem, and there will be no real improvement.
IMO, we're on that path as we speak.
Melnyk is alienating the casual fans, and the casual fans are the difference between a successful team and a bottom-dweller.
Us die-hards will probably always be there, but we're not enough.
A complete change in the mentality and culture of the city and fans would be a good place to start I guess. Easy to see why Melnyk landed on the 'budget team' option lol.
The extra spending can come through the trade market SRF. It would give Murray more options while looking for a trade. We don't know who is available on the market but having the ability to spend more money means it's easier to do trades. For all we know Murray might have been able to parlay a couple of prospects for help on the back end but couldn't because of the budget. It's just unrealistic to expect the team to contend with the 26th payroll. I can understand Melnyk not wanting to spend more money for fear of being burned with zero results but you can't do that when you went to the media and proclaimed you want to win the cup badly for Murray before he retires. For me it's the cup comments that has made most people turn on Melnyk because we were expecting the payroll to increase yet he went and said not much will change even with the new TV deal. He undermined what Cyril Leeder said when Leeder mentioned we'd be able to spend with the top dogs.
Lol all you guys ever want to do is scream at ****ing Melnyk whenever there's an issue, like he's the only problem.
It used to be reasonable, seeing as he has to watch his money, but now you guys are just making up ****. Like I just saw someone say we had to sell a pick to afford Hemskey? Um where the hell did you get that information? Oh that's right up your ass. When will this fanbase ever learn that there's more to this then not sepnding. NOT SPENDING ISN'T EVEN AN ISSUE!!! Like we have basically the same, if not better, roster then we did last year, taking on more salary and we preformed way worse! Wtf guys like are you serious? You don't ****ing spend for the sake of spending! Where will that get you? If we couldn't make the playoffs this year when we could last year, then we aren't even in a position to spend, we should sell! Like holy ****, there are bigger problems then not taking on a useless contract for no reason other then to have a useless contract. This season is on the players and the coach, not on a blown out of proportion budget. Honestly I hate this fanbase more then I hate the team.
All this talk of spending to the cap not helping a team is ridiculous. Just because you spend to the cap doesn't mean you have to handcuff yourself with bad contracts. You can give big money with small term with almost no risk. St. Louis gave big money on small term to Derek Roy and Brendan Morrow and they're doing alright aren't they. Does anyone genuinely think we wouldn't be a completely different team with two defencemen worth 4 million each? Clarke MacArthur was an absolute steal, but excluding Alfie's value to the community and leadership he's still putting up .75 ppg. There's a direct link between spending money and being successful with few exceptions and were not one of them. We're 4 points out of a playoff spot and 8 mil under the cap