Canucks LB
My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
- Oct 12, 2008
- 76,991
- 30,032
Basically a bigger,younger more physical Tanev
Basically a bigger,younger more physical Tanev
Basically a bigger,younger more physical Tanev
Basically a bigger,younger more physical Tanev
Basically a bigger,younger more physical Tanev
The biggest Tanev fanboys here will crucify you for saying that, but the reality is I pretty much agree with this.
He's a defensive D that will probably max out at 20-25 points. He brings elements Tanev simply does not.
The biggest Tanev fanboys here will crucify you for saying that, but the reality is I pretty much agree with this.
He's a defensive D that will probably max out at 20-25 points. He brings elements Tanev simply does not.
If you don't want to get crucified then don't say dumb things. Neither the eye-test nor the stats show that Gudbranson is anywhere near as good as Tanev.
Other than being more physical, he's worse in every way.
I don't see Gudbranson in a negative light, I'm sure he'll be fine as a 2nd pairing guy and he could be a good fit beside Hutton.
The problem is just how we acquired him.
Basically a bigger,younger more physical Tanev
He's a good number 4 that will help Hutton blossom offensively and protect him from mean players
Tanev is also three years older. Sure, he's better right now but Gudbranson's upside is basically a
physical Tanev with slightly worse puck movement in transition...not sure whats so outlandish about that.
He's not just more physical than Tans...he's a lot more physical.