ahmedou
DOU
- Oct 7, 2017
- 19,244
- 18,632
That's one of my favorite show in HFHabs.What does that even mean?
He means Phil Danault is a defensive player. It’s all he’s really good for, and he’s not wrong.What does that even mean?
Ya ok...he is much more than a defensive player.He means Phil Danault is a defensive player. It’s all he’s really good for, and he’s not wrong.
Ya ok...he is much more than a defensive player.
He’s a great person, love the guy, want him on our team, want him in the 3C position. When KK is ready for 2C of course. Suzuki is the 1C.Ya ok...he is much more than a defensive player.
He’s a great person, love the guy, want him on our team, want him in the 3C position. When KK is ready for 2C of course. Suzuki is the 1C.
Great hockey players dont go 9 games with two points and a minus 3.Danault is a great hockey player. I can't repeat this enough.
No, hes not. Thats Gallagher.Bruins fan here. It's hilarious to me that Julien has already found his new version of Bergeron/Marchand. You look at the possession stats, the zone starts, the PK (at least in terms of Danault), and it's like deja vu. Danualt is the guy you'll constantly be trying to convince other fanbases that he's better than the numbers suggest.
Bruins fan here. It's hilarious to me that Julien has already found his new version of Bergeron/Marchand. You look at the possession stats, the zone starts, the PK (at least in terms of Danault), and it's like deja vu. Danualt is the guy you'll constantly be trying to convince other fanbases that he's better than the numbers suggest.
Phil is not as skilled as Bergeron and, especially, Marchand. But he indeed is underrated.Bruins fan here. It's hilarious to me that Julien has already found his new version of Bergeron/Marchand. You look at the possession stats, the zone starts, the PK (at least in terms of Danault), and it's like deja vu. Danualt is the guy you'll constantly be trying to convince other fanbases that he's better than the numbers suggest.
To add, he's a 50-point player in a chair he wouldn't occupy in normal circumstances (ie. a team with actual C talent). Flip the roles next year with Suzuki and I'm not convinced Danault hits nearly the same totals next to Armia, Domi, Lehkonen etc."Good hands, outstanding skater with exceptional vision and hockey IQ."
"Great hockey player."
I can't believe this guy is only a 50-point player with these qualities.
If he keeps it up and proves able to drive the play 5 on 5, that's a distinct possibility.I hope that Suzuki gets the number one next year. Dannault can be a number two - ideally number three.
PD is what he is. Underrated by some overrated by others. By a wide margin I might add.Phil is not as skilled as Bergeron and, especially, Marchand. But he indeed is underrated.
Can't wait to see what Julien is going to do with Suzuki.
Hopefully he signs the same contract as Pageau
Well it definitely wont be the 7+ million that people here expected. Danault also clearly loves it here and Pageau just got traded so who knows if Danault might take a minor discount.He's better than Pageau. I won't count on that.
Well it definitely wont be the 7+ million that people here expected. Danault also clearly loves it here and Pageau just got traded so who knows if Danault might take a minor discount.