stardog
Been on HF so long my Myspace link is part of my p
The discussion was brought up at the end of the draft thread. It was just getting interesting but alas, the draft ended, thus ending the thread.
I'll just copy the question which I posed (and re word it a bit as Rowdy Roddy Peeper made a good point regarding impact players).
Here goes:
I havent read through the boards, and this is the first draft day that Ive missed in YEARS, but my question is this (I'll preface it with a comment).
Im not going to comment on exactly WHO we drafted as I unashamedly plead ignorance, but at the same time has our drafting/scouting become stale???
Is anybody else concerned with the same exact strategy year after year after year? I wasnt at all shocked to find that once again, we didn't draft a Euro (I know about Maata obviously, but he was a CHL import, as was Zlobin...the anamoly being Sundqvist) and that we drafted guysthat are guys going off to college and that there wouldnt be a swing for the fences boom or bust type (though in his defense, its hard to do that without a firstie... Gee, would be nice to have that first back but...
Do we even employ a Euro scout anymore?
Is anybody else concerned about the 'vanilla' draft approach?
Shero has yet to draft ONE full time player outside of the first round since he took over. Yes, it looks like a couple are going to make it like Strait and Muzzin (which Shero then let get away for absolutely zero return but that is a discussion for another day), and a few are on the verge, but none are going to be impact players.
(NOTE: By impact player I am not talking about an all star, award winning type guy. Im simply talking about a guy who is above average to very good. I dont want to get caught up in semantics).
Does this not concern anyone else at all?
Hell, for all of you long timers who were with me on these boards back in the CP days, do we not remember the grief he took for his drafting? And his draft record kills Shero's.
Not meant to be a Shero bash, but for the love of God Ray, try SOMETHING different maybe?
Since 2006, his first draft, his drafting record outside of the first round is shaky.
You can look at the last two pages of the draft day thread for the rest of the discussion if you'd like. It was quite interesting.
And we have always heard that you cant judge his drafts yet as they are still developing. But with his first three drafts you can see (again, outside of the first rounds) the type of players that most are becoming. None pf them look as if they will make an impact (out of those who look like they will actually be in the NHL for at least a cup of coffee.
So is there a cause for concern? Should we still play the wait and see approach? Agree or disagree? Tell me why.
I'll just copy the question which I posed (and re word it a bit as Rowdy Roddy Peeper made a good point regarding impact players).
Here goes:
I havent read through the boards, and this is the first draft day that Ive missed in YEARS, but my question is this (I'll preface it with a comment).
Im not going to comment on exactly WHO we drafted as I unashamedly plead ignorance, but at the same time has our drafting/scouting become stale???
Is anybody else concerned with the same exact strategy year after year after year? I wasnt at all shocked to find that once again, we didn't draft a Euro (I know about Maata obviously, but he was a CHL import, as was Zlobin...the anamoly being Sundqvist) and that we drafted guysthat are guys going off to college and that there wouldnt be a swing for the fences boom or bust type (though in his defense, its hard to do that without a firstie... Gee, would be nice to have that first back but...
Do we even employ a Euro scout anymore?
Is anybody else concerned about the 'vanilla' draft approach?
Shero has yet to draft ONE full time player outside of the first round since he took over. Yes, it looks like a couple are going to make it like Strait and Muzzin (which Shero then let get away for absolutely zero return but that is a discussion for another day), and a few are on the verge, but none are going to be impact players.
(NOTE: By impact player I am not talking about an all star, award winning type guy. Im simply talking about a guy who is above average to very good. I dont want to get caught up in semantics).
Does this not concern anyone else at all?
Hell, for all of you long timers who were with me on these boards back in the CP days, do we not remember the grief he took for his drafting? And his draft record kills Shero's.
Not meant to be a Shero bash, but for the love of God Ray, try SOMETHING different maybe?
Since 2006, his first draft, his drafting record outside of the first round is shaky.
You can look at the last two pages of the draft day thread for the rest of the discussion if you'd like. It was quite interesting.
And we have always heard that you cant judge his drafts yet as they are still developing. But with his first three drafts you can see (again, outside of the first rounds) the type of players that most are becoming. None pf them look as if they will make an impact (out of those who look like they will actually be in the NHL for at least a cup of coffee.
So is there a cause for concern? Should we still play the wait and see approach? Agree or disagree? Tell me why.
Last edited: