Post-Game Talk: Penguins 4 - Canadian 3 - Shoot Out Edition - Are you not entertained?

Status
Not open for further replies.

vodeni

Registered User
Oct 27, 2010
30,335
15,232
Pittsburgh
1st line was absolutely horrible defensively. Crosby basically float around with zero effort, weird.
glad someone noticed...its hard on the night when Jake and Sid scored all three goals, but they got lucky (as they usually are) to not get scored on so many great chances for Montreal, that may be the reason why Sully sat Hino the last ten minutes of the game and put DOC there, but he wasn't the reason for their defensive effort...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buddy Bizarre

Ugene Magic

EVIL LAUGH
Oct 17, 2008
54,352
18,779
Pittsburgh
I did not regret going to the game. It was entertaining and I had a blast.

Puus looks like an NHLer out there.
Just for giggles... You'll always be our Frenchman....


d4reJGA.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kristopher Letang

vodeni

Registered User
Oct 27, 2010
30,335
15,232
Pittsburgh
Yeah, let's blame Crosby tonight. Good catch.
see this is typical....no one needs to blame anyone, especially on the night we won...but if you are the coach and you watch the tape where your best line had 1 high danger scoring chance for and 12 against, you may think you have some work to do, you may want to figure out issues and try to work things out...

A gutsy win while on the second half of a back-to-back against a rested opponent.
The Penguins are 2-0-0 so far this season in such situations.
Last season, we were 0-6-3, meaning we've gotten more points from rested opponents while tired so far this season than we did the entirety of last season.
I feel like we won just about all back to backs this year
 

Ugene Magic

EVIL LAUGH
Oct 17, 2008
54,352
18,779
Pittsburgh
see this is typical....no one needs to blame anyone, especially on the night we won...but if you are the coach and you watch the tape where your best line had 1 high danger scoring chance for and 12 against, you may think you have some work to do, you may want to figure out issues and try to work things out...


I feel like we won just about all back to backs this year
You guys are not alone. I think people saw me nitpick Sid in the GDT.

Not just him, either, this team just loves their pie turnovers.
 

vodeni

Registered User
Oct 27, 2010
30,335
15,232
Pittsburgh
You guys are not alone. I think people saw me nitpick Sid in the GDT.

Not just him, either, this team just loves their pie turnovers.
its not nitpicking...we love Pens, we know a lot about them by now, we are watching games and processing, I hope our caching staff does the same and not lull themselves into feeling that all is good now...
 

Ugene Magic

EVIL LAUGH
Oct 17, 2008
54,352
18,779
Pittsburgh
its not nitpicking...we love Pens, we know a lot about them by now, we are watching games and processing, I hope our caching staff does the same and not lull themselves into feeling that all is good now...

It pretty much is the biggest dagger in their game.
 

KrisLetAngry

MrJukeBoy
Dec 20, 2013
18,171
4,344
Saskatchewan
it's time to move him to wing. we just don't have a center to do that.

Fully agree. I have been wanting to add a 2C over a winger for a couple years now in case of injuries.

Don't look now but Harkins is on pace for zero points!

Also Sully : Harkins to line 1 and pp1

He played 5 minutes
Please notice that Sully is not using him a lot. Stop creating a narrative that he loves him. He tried him early and it failed. He moved on.
 

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
55,761
46,798
Harkins time on ice this game: 4:24.
Puustinen time on ice this game: 15:36.

Harkins time on ice last game: 6:36.
Puustinen time on ice last game: 11:52.

I mean, if your scenario happens, then by all means be angry about it, but it's silly to invent a scenario just to be angry about something.
Did you see the part where I said "when one of the top six wingers returns?"

Puustinen is playing right now because we have an opening in the top six. If you think he'll still be playing when the only spot for him will be somewhere in the bottom six, then you haven't followed this coach for very long.
 

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
55,761
46,798
This guy knows how this works.
For the record, my general overall point is Puustinen likely comes out when our top six is healthy and won't play a bottom six role.

If someone wants to be pedantic and harp on the "LOL but you said Harkins" bit, I'm already getting ahead of that nonsense here by saying insert ANY of the random bottom six scrubs in place of Harkins because my main point was about Puustinen and the chances of him still being played if the only spot for him is in a bottom six role.
 

Pancakes

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 4, 2011
26,312
18,257
the team is unquestionably better this year, but they're still not good enough.

I don't know what you can even change at this point. Like if you gave me a "free transaction that the salary cap ignores" i don't know what one piece would help. Obviously getting healthy would be nice, but they're still too wildly inconsistent everywhere except... 1C?
The good news is I don't think Washington or Philly or the Isles are all that good either, and the Devils and Canes look flawed too.

Only Nyr have been good all year. So the Pens have a punchers chance at least.

If the pp can become functional and the goaltending stays this good we might actually have the makings of a decent team. Two massive ifs though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buddy Bizarre

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
40,637
18,829
He really, really has been. A lot of shakey signings but Neds seems to have really found his game. Another great example of fresh starts given to good players going well. And they REALLY needed that after Jarry's shakey start.

Puustinen doing well is an added benefit at the moment. Makes me wonder if that is shifting any plans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy99

IcedCapp

Registered User
Aug 7, 2009
35,933
11,544
The good news is I don't think Washington or Philly or the Isles are all that good either, and the Devils and Canes look flawed too.

Only Nyr have been good all year. So the Pens have a punchers chance at least.

If the pp can become functional and the goaltending stays this good we might actually have the makings of a decent team. Two massive ifs though.
Yeah I keep waiting for Washington and Philly to regress (the caps in particular seem incredibly unsustainable), but I don’t wanna just make it to the playoffs and get swept. I’d like to win a damn game.

If you think this is rock bottom, you are going to be sad as each year is significantly worse as our core falls off the cliff in production. We certainly aren't in the "OMG how much higher does this go?" part of the roller coaster and are well into the "Wheeeeeee" phase.

Crosby, Malkin, Letang, EK, Jake, Rust, etc will all most likely be worse players next year.

war-basic-chart.png

ppo-war-graph.png
Nah nah nah, I was a fan during the bad years. I just mean this has to be rock bottom for THIS PP with THIS talent. I don’t mean the team. Just the 0 for 30-something PP while trotting out 3-5 hall for fame offensive players
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pancakes

OtherThingsILike

Registered User
May 6, 2020
1,507
1,272
Pittsburgh
I feel like we won just about all back to backs this year
Yes, we have, although the other two were games against opponents who had also played the day/night before.
For the record, my general overall point is Puustinen likely comes out when our top six is healthy and won't play a bottom six role.
Not a given. Nylander was played in a Top 6 role even when Rakell and Rust were both healthy (Rakell was tried on the third line).
If someone wants to be pedantic and harp on the "LOL but you said Harkins" bit, I'm already getting ahead of that nonsense here by saying insert ANY of the random bottom six scrubs in place of Harkins because my main point was about Puustinen and the chances of him still being played if the only spot for him is in a bottom six role.
But you can't just handwave away the bottom six as though they're all indistinguishable from Harkins. Puustinen would play over Harkins, even if the only role for him is in the bottom six.
Would Puustinen play if all forwards are healthy? Right now, yes, because the power play is clicking with him on it. If the power play's effectiveness goes back to what it was before? Maybe not.
 

66-30-33

Registered User
Jan 24, 2006
63,289
16,269
Victoria, BC
He really, really has been. A lot of shakey signings but Neds seems to have really found his game. Another great example of fresh starts given to good players going well. And they REALLY needed that after Jarry's shakey start.

Puustinen doing well is an added benefit at the moment. Makes me wonder if that is shifting any plans.
Imagine we kept DeSuck.
 

Sidgeni Malkby

Registered User
Nov 19, 2008
2,552
945
NJ
For the record, my general overall point is Puustinen likely comes out when our top six is healthy and won't play a bottom six role.

If someone wants to be pedantic and harp on the "LOL but you said Harkins" bit, I'm already getting ahead of that nonsense here by saying insert ANY of the random bottom six scrubs in place of Harkins because my main point was about Puustinen and the chances of him still being played if the only spot for him is in a bottom six role.
I hope Sully considers a more offensive L3 with:
DOC - Eller - Puustinen

Give line 4 all of the D responsibilities (ie. Acciari, Nieto, etc).
 

Honour Over Glory

Fire Sully
Jan 30, 2012
77,316
42,447
I mean yeah, he's a .935. That's brilliant work in this high scoring era. Plus he's been assaulted pretty good in his games. No lack of quality chances against.
But of course it's easier to do in a small sample size. I wasn't suggesting he should take over the #1 gig, but atm I feel more confident with him than Jarry. I'd like to see him get more games. Jarry needs the rest anyway. It's a good way to prevent injuries, so in the unlikely case we do make the playoffs, maybe we can actually have our goalies available this time.
You mentioned the reason why though - Jarry needs rest, yes, but that's why you and others trust Ned more right now, Ned is rested and should have been playing more, but Jarry was getting over played like usual by Sullivan, long stretches of games for a goalie that had a couple of seasons of injuries that nagged him, that's not really all that intelligent from the coaching staff.

But I mean, that's to be expected by a low intelligence group of wankers like the coach and his staff, also his GM.

Imagine we kept DeSuck.
I am f***ing glad I never have to see his stupid ass in a Pens uniform ever again. f*** that tosser.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 66-30-33

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
55,761
46,798
I hope Sully considers a more offensive L3 with:
DOC - Eller - Puustinen

Give line 4 all of the D responsibilities (ie. Acciari, Nieto, etc).
I've been advocating for more balanced scoring for a while. I don't think it makes sense to try and construct your lines where your bottom six's only function is drawing the other team 0-0. It's not going to kill you to infuse some offensive ability onto the 3rd line so that Sid/Geno don't have to carry 99.9% of the offense every single game.
 

BusinessGoose

Registered User
May 19, 2022
3,565
3,423
St. Louis
Don't look now but Harkins is on pace for zero points!

Also Sully : Harkins to line 1 and pp1
"I feel like we've seen some really good things. Seen some areas we can work on.

If you counted shootout goals, you would see Harkins on the pace we expected.

So we're going to slot him in alongside Sid, to really exploit that offense we feel is there.

I see a lot of myself in his style of playing the right way out there."
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Genetic

Dennis Reynolds

I have to have my tools!
Jun 10, 2011
3,287
3,235
Paddy's Pub
"I feel like we've seen some really good things. Seen some areas we can work on.

If you counted shootout goals, you would see Harkins on the pace we expected.

So we're going to slot him in alongside Sid, to really exploit that offense we feel is there.

I see a lot of myself in his style of playing the right way out there."
I don't know what reacc to give this because you can't leave them all for one post and I'd need a sad and angry one too.
 

Will Hunting

Immortal Adams
Dec 14, 2011
7,091
2,245
European Union
Read some Habs comments. Even they noticed Malkin skating and looking like zombie, talking about him being close to retirement. Did he really have such a bad game?
 

ChaosAgent

Registered User
May 8, 2018
17,888
12,194
Read some Habs comments. Even they noticed Malkin skating and looking like zombie, talking about him being close to retirement. Did he really have such a bad game?

Malkin looked fine for what he is these days.

He is the slowest guy on the team and in basically every game. He still has more skill than almost every player but unless he's scoring (or his line is scoring) it's not going to look good. I don't know the recipe for being effective while being the slowest guy on the ice as we enter 2024, but for the sake of having a decent 2nd line hopefully Geno and the coaching staff figure it out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vodeni
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad