Sidgeni Malkby
Registered User
I was waiting for Jarry to have a chance in the shootout .
Glad we got the 2 points!
Glad we got the 2 points!
That would have been glorious...I was waiting for Jarry to have a chance in the shootout .
Glad we got the 2 points!
glad someone noticed...its hard on the night when Jake and Sid scored all three goals, but they got lucky (as they usually are) to not get scored on so many great chances for Montreal, that may be the reason why Sully sat Hino the last ten minutes of the game and put DOC there, but he wasn't the reason for their defensive effort...1st line was absolutely horrible defensively. Crosby basically float around with zero effort, weird.
Just for giggles... You'll always be our Frenchman....I did not regret going to the game. It was entertaining and I had a blast.
Puus looks like an NHLer out there.
see this is typical....no one needs to blame anyone, especially on the night we won...but if you are the coach and you watch the tape where your best line had 1 high danger scoring chance for and 12 against, you may think you have some work to do, you may want to figure out issues and try to work things out...Yeah, let's blame Crosby tonight. Good catch.
I feel like we won just about all back to backs this yearA gutsy win while on the second half of a back-to-back against a rested opponent.
The Penguins are 2-0-0 so far this season in such situations.
Last season, we were 0-6-3, meaning we've gotten more points from rested opponents while tired so far this season than we did the entirety of last season.
You guys are not alone. I think people saw me nitpick Sid in the GDT.see this is typical....no one needs to blame anyone, especially on the night we won...but if you are the coach and you watch the tape where your best line had 1 high danger scoring chance for and 12 against, you may think you have some work to do, you may want to figure out issues and try to work things out...
I feel like we won just about all back to backs this year
its not nitpicking...we love Pens, we know a lot about them by now, we are watching games and processing, I hope our caching staff does the same and not lull themselves into feeling that all is good now...You guys are not alone. I think people saw me nitpick Sid in the GDT.
Not just him, either, this team just loves their pie turnovers.
its not nitpicking...we love Pens, we know a lot about them by now, we are watching games and processing, I hope our caching staff does the same and not lull themselves into feeling that all is good now...
it's time to move him to wing. we just don't have a center to do that.
Don't look now but Harkins is on pace for zero points!
Also Sully : Harkins to line 1 and pp1
Did you see the part where I said "when one of the top six wingers returns?"Harkins time on ice this game: 4:24.
Puustinen time on ice this game: 15:36.
Harkins time on ice last game: 6:36.
Puustinen time on ice last game: 11:52.
I mean, if your scenario happens, then by all means be angry about it, but it's silly to invent a scenario just to be angry about something.
This guy knows how this works.Did you see the part where I said "when one of the top six wingers returns?"
Puustinen is playing right now because we have an opening in the top six. If you think he'll still be playing when the only spot for him will be somewhere in the bottom six, then you haven't followed this coach for very long.
For the record, my general overall point is Puustinen likely comes out when our top six is healthy and won't play a bottom six role.This guy knows how this works.
The good news is I don't think Washington or Philly or the Isles are all that good either, and the Devils and Canes look flawed too.the team is unquestionably better this year, but they're still not good enough.
I don't know what you can even change at this point. Like if you gave me a "free transaction that the salary cap ignores" i don't know what one piece would help. Obviously getting healthy would be nice, but they're still too wildly inconsistent everywhere except... 1C?
He really, really has been. A lot of shakey signings but Neds seems to have really found his game. Another great example of fresh starts given to good players going well. And they REALLY needed that after Jarry's shakey start.Alex Nedeljkovic has been pleasant surprise for Penguins
He played another strong game on Wednesday night.www.pensburgh.com
Yeah I keep waiting for Washington and Philly to regress (the caps in particular seem incredibly unsustainable), but I don’t wanna just make it to the playoffs and get swept. I’d like to win a damn game.The good news is I don't think Washington or Philly or the Isles are all that good either, and the Devils and Canes look flawed too.
Only Nyr have been good all year. So the Pens have a punchers chance at least.
If the pp can become functional and the goaltending stays this good we might actually have the makings of a decent team. Two massive ifs though.
Nah nah nah, I was a fan during the bad years. I just mean this has to be rock bottom for THIS PP with THIS talent. I don’t mean the team. Just the 0 for 30-something PP while trotting out 3-5 hall for fame offensive playersIf you think this is rock bottom, you are going to be sad as each year is significantly worse as our core falls off the cliff in production. We certainly aren't in the "OMG how much higher does this go?" part of the roller coaster and are well into the "Wheeeeeee" phase.
Crosby, Malkin, Letang, EK, Jake, Rust, etc will all most likely be worse players next year.
Yes, we have, although the other two were games against opponents who had also played the day/night before.I feel like we won just about all back to backs this year
Not a given. Nylander was played in a Top 6 role even when Rakell and Rust were both healthy (Rakell was tried on the third line).For the record, my general overall point is Puustinen likely comes out when our top six is healthy and won't play a bottom six role.
But you can't just handwave away the bottom six as though they're all indistinguishable from Harkins. Puustinen would play over Harkins, even if the only role for him is in the bottom six.If someone wants to be pedantic and harp on the "LOL but you said Harkins" bit, I'm already getting ahead of that nonsense here by saying insert ANY of the random bottom six scrubs in place of Harkins because my main point was about Puustinen and the chances of him still being played if the only spot for him is in a bottom six role.
Imagine we kept DeSuck.He really, really has been. A lot of shakey signings but Neds seems to have really found his game. Another great example of fresh starts given to good players going well. And they REALLY needed that after Jarry's shakey start.
Puustinen doing well is an added benefit at the moment. Makes me wonder if that is shifting any plans.
I hope Sully considers a more offensive L3 with:For the record, my general overall point is Puustinen likely comes out when our top six is healthy and won't play a bottom six role.
If someone wants to be pedantic and harp on the "LOL but you said Harkins" bit, I'm already getting ahead of that nonsense here by saying insert ANY of the random bottom six scrubs in place of Harkins because my main point was about Puustinen and the chances of him still being played if the only spot for him is in a bottom six role.
You mentioned the reason why though - Jarry needs rest, yes, but that's why you and others trust Ned more right now, Ned is rested and should have been playing more, but Jarry was getting over played like usual by Sullivan, long stretches of games for a goalie that had a couple of seasons of injuries that nagged him, that's not really all that intelligent from the coaching staff.I mean yeah, he's a .935. That's brilliant work in this high scoring era. Plus he's been assaulted pretty good in his games. No lack of quality chances against.
But of course it's easier to do in a small sample size. I wasn't suggesting he should take over the #1 gig, but atm I feel more confident with him than Jarry. I'd like to see him get more games. Jarry needs the rest anyway. It's a good way to prevent injuries, so in the unlikely case we do make the playoffs, maybe we can actually have our goalies available this time.
I am f***ing glad I never have to see his stupid ass in a Pens uniform ever again. f*** that tosser.Imagine we kept DeSuck.
I've been advocating for more balanced scoring for a while. I don't think it makes sense to try and construct your lines where your bottom six's only function is drawing the other team 0-0. It's not going to kill you to infuse some offensive ability onto the 3rd line so that Sid/Geno don't have to carry 99.9% of the offense every single game.I hope Sully considers a more offensive L3 with:
DOC - Eller - Puustinen
Give line 4 all of the D responsibilities (ie. Acciari, Nieto, etc).
"I feel like we've seen some really good things. Seen some areas we can work on.Don't look now but Harkins is on pace for zero points!
Also Sully : Harkins to line 1 and pp1
I don't know what reacc to give this because you can't leave them all for one post and I'd need a sad and angry one too."I feel like we've seen some really good things. Seen some areas we can work on.
If you counted shootout goals, you would see Harkins on the pace we expected.
So we're going to slot him in alongside Sid, to really exploit that offense we feel is there.
I see a lot of myself in his style of playing the right way out there."
Read some Habs comments. Even they noticed Malkin skating and looking like zombie, talking about him being close to retirement. Did he really have such a bad game?