Northernhawk
Registered User
- Feb 22, 2020
- 2,512
- 1,269
Reichel is the only one that would have any trade value other then c prospect for c prospect. maybe Entwistle on a 2 way contract. the 7 above vlasic Crev guttman for sure stauber maybe. I do feel we can do better then Anderson and Katchouk on the roster if its to have then be insurance and play in Rockford im fine. Raddysh agent is probably want to goto ARB (he would get way more there then on the open market. my guess is we do not give him QOI voted for seven
Raddysh, Anderson, Katchouk, Guttman, Vlasic, Crevier and Stauber
Hoping the Hawks trade Reichel, Entwistle, RJohnson, Hardman, Teply, Phillips and Roos
You can walk away from an arbitration award. Raddysh's QO is very low ($813,750) and I think he's a proven NHL player at a minimum still below the league's average age. My approach would be to see if he will re-sign for cheap on 1-2 year deal, and then if his shooting % improves, try to flip closer to next deadline.I will be so mad if Raddysh gets qualified. His 20 goal season was the aberration. Plus he’s got arbitration rights. If you think Kurashev’s deal was gross, wait until you see what they give a 20 goal scorer (purely because of Patrick Kane)
you can only walk away from 4.5 mil or higher. so it he gets 2 years 3 mil its yours to keepYou can walk away from an arbitration award. Raddysh's QO is very low ($813,750) and I think he's a proven NHL player at a minimum still below the league's average age. My approach would be to see if he will re-sign for cheap on 1-2 year deal, and then if his shooting % improves, try to flip closer to next deadline.
Either way, this number doesn't impact us at all. We have to spend that money and I like @WarriorofTime's idea of seeing if his shooting % improves and flip him later.you can only walk away from 4.5 mil or higher. so it he gets 2 years 3 mil its yours to keep
I think history has shown us that the Oppt to improve shooting and flip was last year. this year I think is more what you can expect and do we want to be tied to him for 2 years if that is how the reward goes. KD walked away from Suter and strome I think because he was worried about the award. my guess is now way we QO him. I feel like this would be consistent with KD thinking. he could agree to a 2 year 1.5 before which might make sense.Either way, this number doesn't impact us at all. We have to spend that money and I like @WarriorofTime's idea of seeing if his shooting % improves and flip him later.
Strome had a fairly expensive qualifying offer, $3.6 million because he was coming off a deal that paid him an AAV of $3 million and he ultimately signed a 1 year deal for less than his QO. Raddysh makes pennies. Especially at the time, what made Strome such a frustrating player is that he served no function other than bad team scorer. No good team would want to trade for him or fit him in cap wise because he didn't have good depth center qualities and for bad teams (Hawks included) he was just a fill-in top line player and in the case of the Hawks going for the Bedard sweepstakes, arguably a tank blocker.I think history has shown us that the Oppt to improve shooting and flip was last year. this year I think is more what you can expect and do we want to be tied to him for 2 years if that is how the reward goes. KD walked away from Suter and strome I think because he was worried about the award. my guess is now way we QO him. I feel like this would be consistent with KD thinking. he could agree to a 2 year 1.5 before which might make sense.
the Q O is not the issue its the arb rights. you know that right. if the QO him at $760 and he does not accept. which he will never accept then goes to ARB. he will have had 36 goals in the NHL with a high of 20 assuming he does not score anymore. Kurshev had 23 goals in the NHL when he went last year with a high of 9. and got 2 years for 2.25. so the binding Arbitrator is probably going to say 2.5 to 2.75 which is just way to high.Strome had a fairly expensive qualifying offer, $3.6 million because he was coming off a deal that paid him an AAV of $3 million and he ultimately signed a 1 year deal for less than his QO. Raddysh makes pennies. Especially at the time, what made Strome such a frustrating player is that he served no function other than bad team scorer. No good team would want to trade for him or fit him in cap wise because he didn't have good depth center qualities and for bad teams (Hawks included) he was just a fill-in top line player and in the case of the Hawks going for the Bedard sweepstakes, arguably a tank blocker.
Washington ends up being a pretty good fit as a team content to be shooting the middle in Ovechkin's last few seasons and in desperate need of a fill-in top line Center to do even that with Backstrom basically retired and Kuznetsov in player assistance.
Pius Suter was in Bowman's last stand to go for it when they brought in Jones, Johnson, etc. letting Suter walk for nothing was a mistake imo. Presumably Bowman felt the Hawks were crowded at Forwards and didn't want a Suter potential arb award against the cap and they likely thought Henrik Borgstrom was as good/better (spoiler - he wasn't).
Yeah, re-sign Phillips and Crevier for close to the minimum for 6th/7th DMan duties. If they get unseated by Kaiser/Allan/Del Mastro, that's fine, they will likely pass through waivers and can come back up at some point. In Crevier's case, Rinzel will go back to college and Hawks aren't bursting out with other naturally right-handed defensemen in the system right now. Plus, the dude is just a massive human so there's intrigue there to "gamble" on something coming of him as he ages and gains more experience.Vlasic, Reichel, Phillips and Guttman
Crevier i am 50/50 on, He isn't showing much to say "Yeah this guy has it" but he also is only 22 and RD so at worst he would give us a RD in Rockford who can fill in at NHL level
Push comes to shove I would probably qualify him
Kurashev's award and cap ended up being perfectly fine, is anyone really stressing about Kurashev at $2.25 AAV this year and next season? If that's the doomsday scenario that we're afraid of, then I say "so what" and would say to extend and go back to arbitration if need be (but hopefully re-sign for cheap before).the Q O is not the issue its the arb rights. you know that right. if the QO him at $760 and he does not accept. which he will never accept then goes to ARB. he will have had 36 goals in the NHL with a high of 20 assuming he does not score anymore. Kurshev had 23 goals in the NHL when he went last year with a high of 9. and got 2 years for 2.25. so the binding Arbitrator is probably going to say 2.5 to 2.75 which is just way to high.
The arbitrator can only award a 1 or 2 year contract. The party that did not elect the arbitration selects the term (if the player selected arbitration, the team selects 1 or 2 year term). Players that are only 1 year away from being a UFA can only have a 1 year contract awarded.as a point of REF the Blackhawks offer was 1.4 years and Kur was 2.65. Im pretty sure KD was shocked with 2.25 coming off 9 goals. he has made strides this year so its fine but what it TR has another 6 goal year do you want him on the books for $3 mil for 2 years. my point is you cannot walk away from ARB and you really have no idea what they are going to come up with. that is why I think he will not get QO.
1.4 - 2.25 is $850K different. not $600K we can move from this discussion.The arbitrator can only award a 1 or 2 year contract. The party that did not elect the arbitration selects the term (if the player selected arbitration, the team selects 1 or 2 year term). Players that are only 1 year away from being a UFA can only have a 1 year contract awarded.
Raddysh cannot receive 2 years/$3 million AAV. The absolute "doomsday" scenario is 1 year/$3 million if the arbitrator is drunk. Hawks offer was only 0.6 million off what Kurashev got and they ended up electing for 2 years when they could have done 1 since Kurashev took them to arbitration.
Yes my bad, still just a min roster amount of difference.1.4 - 2.25 is $850K different. not $600K we can move from this discussion.