If the Rangers don’t end up trading Kakko (Laf won’t be) they will have Panarin and Kreider signed with Kakko Lafraniere and Kravtsov as wingers. If they don’t want to keep Buch Long term makes sense to deal him.
today this very minute $ is not a prob
BUT
sooner than later,
youth will be served and less expensive but signif talented younger guys will force out more expensive vets.
necessary to keep down pressure on the salary cap and = roster depth + flexibility.
well yes, but Kreider has a NMC. I'd love to keep Buchnevich but then it almost makes sense to trade Kakko so that one of them isn't playing 3rd line minutes (unless Kreider does)
Not sure what the deal is w/Kreider got a feeling he's playing thru somethin.
Either way no prob w/him at 3rd line.
b'c it's breadman, our first is:
Kakko-Kravtsov-Panarin
Krav will play C and AP will go to his natural right hand side which doesn't matter on offense, they gravitate as is most comfortable but helps w/faceoffs and other def aspects so not reaching over on backhand to get the puck
then
LaF-Chytil-Gauthier
Chytil showed enuf given injury. Gauthier was denied by Q, good riddance.
On paper that line works.
So Kreid slips to 3LW and w/more rest hopefully the beast factor returns
At this pt I see ufa Danault for 1-2 yrs only at 7.25 per
we then use Jones at 3RW [explained below]
4th line is Barron/Blackwell/Gettinger etc
-------
we deal Strome + Buch + Zib NOW b'c a team pays more for more production and they get more now then as a rental.
very possible to do 1 stop shopping w/SEA, a topic for another thread
--------
adding some beef, our D is
Lindgren - Fox
KAM - Trouba
Robertson - Nils L
we acquire rfa D Zadorov cheap from CHI who needs cap space
he plays either side and is our swing 7th
Schneider, don't burn a year off elc, but can be emergency call up
Jones is other alternate emergency D
Rangers have only 1 surplus blue chip in LD Jones and we can't trade him early b'c
"he may be another Fox" so we have to be sure if that checks out we get full value for him.
However our D is full and we need more tuffness
So Jones, who has offensive skill, as a 3RW w/the right line could be interesting.