But you can't just take an entirely fair and relevant aspect of a subject out of allowed discussion simply because you associate negative agendas with it that may or may not be apparent on a case by case basis. It needs to be acceptable that Louie Eriksson's contract gets brought up in a thread about Louie Eriksson, even if it can easily be wrongfully politicized into a petty pro vs. anti Benning thing, and whether you're sick of hearing about it or not. We don't have ownership over what others should want to talk about. Criticize individual cases where people push the agenda and politicize it, and criticize the general need for people to want to do it, sure, but don't criticize all mention of the subject altogether.
We've already had a lengthy back and forth detailing all of this and then some and the posts were all deleted by mods for discussing what we think is/isn't acceptable discussion (frustrating, because I think I was making good points). So let's not go back to the beginning and start all over again.
What the..... why are you being snarky and confrontational about that?
how come there arent any Sergachev bashing posts? he's exactly the kind of ppqb defencemen we didnt need!
Yeah, but the point of contention we had was about why it does or doesn't make sense to allow people to bring up Tkachuk in a Juolevi thread despite the toxicity that it gets associated with. Any continued reasoning about that is probably going to go down the path of "playing moderator."
