Good to hear.
And Tuch continues to be the rah-rah guy in the way Grier was for Drury-Briere back when people thought he should have a letter (it was Teppo with the A in those days).
Good analogy. Agreed
Good to hear.
And Tuch continues to be the rah-rah guy in the way Grier was for Drury-Briere back when people thought he should have a letter (it was Teppo with the A in those days).
I bet Gionta has some decent tales to tell.
lol ok man. fitting name.Happy to be in the minority here and hate 2 of 3 choices.
Okposo, with age, will struggle to stay healthy as well as produce as he did last year (which I will consider a one-off). Then he won't be re-signed, and a 1 yr C is worth nothing.
Girgs won't be re-signed either.
Dahlin is obv choice for an A.
Tuch and Thompson should have been the A and C. (or just Ads if not ready).
Not the answer I expected either but really insightful. Love Okposo.
Just from recent interviews, two things I've learned:There have been some tangential commentary. That said, Okposo has been walking the walk and talking the talk for a while and is a deserved recipient of the C.
na I think it was his contract not his on ice performance. He was always a reliable force on the LOG line.I loved Okposo's comeback year. Who wouldn't. My worry with his as captain is he can't sit now without it being major locker room issue and if last year was temporary blip, we are stuck with him in the lineup. Literally, a year earlier people wanted Kyle benched. I hope he has another great year or even a decent year and this is a non-issue.
I bet Gionta has some decent tales to tell.
I remember hearing him being interviewed on the radio after the Eichel trade, and the host asked him something about Eichel's attitude/personality. Gionta basically came back with "My mom taught me 'if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all,'" and went silent after that.
I'm glad we finally have the real/natural leaders in the room actually leading the room.
I'm not crazy about the choice but virtually means little. I think Girgensons will be resigned though.Happy to be in the minority here and hate 2 of 3 choices.
Okposo, with age, will struggle to stay healthy as well as produce as he did last year (which I will consider a one-off). Then he won't be re-signed, and a 1 yr C is worth nothing.
Girgs won't be re-signed either.
Dahlin is obv choice for an A.
Tuch and Thompson should have been the A and C. (or just Ads if not ready).
No, no, no ....I'm not crazy about the choice but virtually means little. I think Girgensons will be resigned though.
Basically, Sabres need a core star to be the long-term captain. The captain does not have to be the best player but he has to be good and his play on the ice matters. Okposo was up to it last year. Other years he was not even close. Some years he was an okay 3rd or 4th line guy. I don't want a 4th liner as captain. Really needs to be a top 4 D man or top 6 forward.
Not the answer I expected either but really insightful. Love Okposo.
I'm not crazy about the choice but virtually means little. I think Girgensons will be resigned though.
Basically, Sabres need a core star to be the long-term captain. The captain does not have to be the best player but he has to be good and his play on the ice matters. Okposo was up to it last year. Other years he was not even close. Some years he was an okay 3rd or 4th line guy. I don't want a 4th liner as captain. Really needs to be a top 4 D man or top 6 forward.
Why do you believe that?I loved Okposo's comeback year. Who wouldn't. My worry with his as captain is he can't sit now without it being major locker room issue and if last year was temporary blip, we are stuck with him in the lineup. Literally, a year earlier people wanted Kyle benched. I hope he has another great year or even a decent year and this is a non-issue.
First bolded: What goalie was BUF signing other than Eric Comrie? They tried to get Matt Murray; who nixed the deal. Sabres signed Ilya Lyubushkin. At center, they stated they preferred to grow their lineup organically rather than injecting a vet from outside the org.I'm in the minority but I still don't get why playoffs couldn't have been more of a priority this year. We didn't need to sacrifice any prospects. Sign one better goalie, get a depth D, a centre who takes face offs. All short-term or even one year. Kyle could have been the A. Girgensons is a Sabres lifer and an easy choice for captain. Hardly the end of the world having Okposo in there and the guy's story is impossible not to love. But to me it's a caretaker season move.
I don't want Okposo signed for anything more than one year. And wait until the off-season.
I'm done with emotional moves. I have faith in Kevyn Adams. I think Okposo is a caretaker captain this year and not much more.
Jack Eichel was BUF's top scorer four straight seasons beginning with his 2nd year, and was their top talent by far his entire tenure.I'm not crazy about the choice but virtually means little. I think Girgensons will be resigned though.
Basically, Sabres need a core star to be the long-term captain. The captain does not have to be the best player but he has to be good and his play on the ice matters. Okposo was up to it last year. Other years he was not even close. Some years he was an okay 3rd or 4th line guy. I don't want a 4th liner as captain. Really needs to be a top 4 D man or top 6 forward.
Why?Happy to be in the minority here and hate 2 of 3 choices.
Okposo, with age, will struggle to stay healthy as well as produce as he did last year (which I will consider a one-off). Then he won't be re-signed, and a 1 yr C is worth nothing.
Girgs won't be re-signed either.
Dahlin is obv choice for an A.
Tuch and Thompson should have been the A and C. (or just Ads if not ready).
(and)Fit your own oxygen mask before assisting others.
I initially thought Tuch but I’ve been listening to a few Okposo interviews and for the last six months I’ve been convinced Kyle was getting the C. That dude is a leader and this is well deserved.
It’s really nice to see the team choose based on leadership, not skill as a player. Our last captain had no right being one.
Wholeheartedly agree to both posts above.No, no, no ....
We have no idea who says/what in the locker room or on the bench for that matter
You DON'T have to be a great/good at hockey to be a leader
Agreed.He says exactly what I've blathered about multiple times in threads about the captaincy. Players end up with a letter because of who they already are. If you're a captain, you don't have to change anything about yourself to play the role (and imo, if you have to do that you really aren't a leader). Also, leaders don't stop being leaders if they don't end up with a letter for some erroneous reason. If they do, they might have been a leader but really aren't in the long run if they change their ways out of spite or a belief that their role doesn't matter as much.
With this particular roster, who wears the letters doesn't matter a whole lot, because they collectively have a lot of character. Okposo justifiably is wearing the C, but he would keep being the most positive influence in the locker room without it.