GAMO1992
#ThankYouIggy
Something something Kane. Something something accuser. Something something.
Plus Erik Johnson signed a big deal yesterday.
Yep, I guess it's okay but I feel like that's a little steep if you're paying him solely on his abilities.
compared to the Klefbom deal this is a ****ing steal for the AvsYep, I guess it's okay but I feel like that's a little steep if you're paying him solely on his abilities.
It's a fantastic deal. He's what's keeping their backend stable and that runs through his prime. Also could have gone UFA so there's that too
Yep, I guess it's okay but I feel like that's a little steep if you're paying him solely on his abilities.
Not at all. He's a top 15 Defenseman in the NHL. He'd be a number one on at least 16 teams.
I think you're underrating just how strongly Johnson's played in the last two years. I'm not saying he was a top 15 D three years ago, but neither was Giordano.
I am going to agree with the majority. Great deal for Johnson. Good dman for them.
Johnson is a player who does stuff right. Not flashy or a standout but does everything right and is influential enough that he is Colorado Defense.
Off the top of my head I'd take the following over Johnson:
(A)
Keith
Subban
Gio
Doughty
Hedman
Letang
Karlsson
Weber
Pietrangelo
OEL
Brodie
Josi
McDonagh
(B)
Carlson
Faulk
Suter
Hamilton
(C)
Lindholm
Hamonic
Burns
I'll leave it saying this, I wouldn't pay him more than Hamilton because he's not better than him.
I'll leave it saying this, I wouldn't pay him more than Hamilton because he's not better than him.
At this point, no Hamilton isn't better than EJ. Hamilton can become much better but isn't there yet. Whereas EJ is a consistent and steady D-man. I honestly think if the Avs weren't as weak on D, and he had a partner like Giordano has Brodie, he'd easily be top 15.
And Hamonic, Josi, Letang, and Burns I would not take before EJ.
I agree with everything, but disagree on Josi.
I think Group A is better than Johnson, Group B really is in the same class right now, and group C is not as good as Johnson right now. Just My Opinion. Unless you forgot a guy from your list who would be on mine, that would put him roughly 14 to 18 on my list. Brodie/Josi + Weber/Gio play on only two teams so that's 13 defensemen on 11 teams. In other words, Johnson would have a strong argument for #1D on 19 teams based on my opinion of your list.
Really, I think Johnson is maybe 500k overpaid, it's not a horrible deal by any means.
Really, I think Johnson is maybe 500k overpaid, it's not a horrible deal by any means.
I don't know. That is bias right there. EJ is there number 1 dman and is only costing them 6 per for the next 7 years. Hamilton is our number 2/3 making 250k less. I'm sure Johnson would be better if he actually had competent dmen.
I'm sure if Johsnon had d partners like Calgary he would be doing a lot better.
I think he's about 500k underpaid considering that deal ends at age 34.
I disagree with some of your assessments, but one guy I just realized you forgot is John Klingberg. That is one more player I would take over Erik Johnson.
So basically EJ is exactly #15 on my list.
Not saying some of those young guys can't get better but let's see them prove it first.
I think EJ gets a bad rap because he was a #1 OA pick. It's always associated with him and people just see that he's no Chris Pronger and automatically write him off as a bust. In reality he was just a player from a terrible defensemen draft class who took a very typical slow, steady curve. The player right now, most teams would love to have him on that contract. We would too, if our top 3D weren't the best in the NHL.
Those are all fair points. I standby my rankings though, he's just not someone I'm scared to face but I agree in that I'd love to have him.