Let's get a tally going, five fallers ALL on the table at 16, who you got?
A) Casey Middelstadt (concerns about pullups)
B) Timothy Liljegren (Concerns about floor)
C) Martin Necas (concerns about obscurity)
D) Lias Andersson (Concerns about ceiling)
E) Nick Suzuki (Concerns abot skating)
Pick one. Only one. The other four becomes a Leaf, A Bruin, A Shark, A Blue
Let's get a tally going, five fallers ALL on the table at 16, who you got?
A) Casey Middelstadt (concerns about pullups)
B) Timothy Liljegren (Concerns about floor)
C) Martin Necas (concerns about obscurity)
D) Lias Andersson (Concerns about ceiling)
E) Nick Suzuki (Concerns abot skating)
Pick one. Only one. The other four becomes a Leaf, A Bruin, A Shark, A Blue
I also remember when you said: Connor Brown > Clayton Keller
Remember when you guys told me Lias Andersson had a low ceiling about 80000 times?
I also think Valimaki is a better prospect than Andersson.
Tolvanen has 6 points (3G/3A) in 3 games in the KHL... how did he fall?
He had 30 G in 52 games in the USHL (which is a much tougher league to score in then the CHL IMO. very good prospects like White, Boeser and Fox were all around a PPG in their draft years and yet, fell; the USHL is still underrated for talent)
Also, speaking of the USHL, watch out for Andre Svechnikov. He had 29G and 29 A in 48 games in his draft minus one season. I think he's probably the best Russian prospect since Ovechkin or Malkin.
I love Tolvanen, way better than Veselainen by comparison.
Wouldn't be the first time you were fooled by a small size.
Wouldnt be the first time you were fooled by a small sample size.