Captain Mountain Formerly Captain Wolverine Jun 6, 2010 20,476 14,060 Jul 1, 2016 #11 That's... really bad.
WesMcCauley Registered User Apr 24, 2015 8,616 2,600 Jul 1, 2016 #12 Why not keep Okposo if you are gonna overpay for Ladd? Okposo is better and younger
Plub Part time Leaf fan Jan 9, 2011 14,932 1,744 Arizona Jul 1, 2016 #13 Geezus, what's with the long term contracts?
saintflannel Registered User Oct 6, 2011 5,203 75 Jul 1, 2016 #15 Whoa. That's quite the term for Ladd.
Esq in terrorem Sponsor Feb 5, 2009 7,923 3,899 Village in the City Jul 1, 2016 #16 Must not have watch Ladd in the playoffs last year. He's a third liner right now.
Remington 700 Registered User Jul 11, 2007 1,622 32 South Park, PA Jul 1, 2016 #17 Isn't he 30 or 31 now?
Mint Berry Crunch Bring the crunch. May 8, 2009 1,985 25 Long Island, NY Jul 1, 2016 #18 ...woof. That's gonna sting.
A Pointed Stick No Idea About The Future Dec 23, 2010 16,105 333 Jul 1, 2016 #19 Good signing but the term is not great.
CG14 Registered User Aug 15, 2010 356 0 Halifax Jul 1, 2016 #20 The first brick of the day. Guaranteed buyout
SI90 Registered User Jul 25, 2011 85,758 63,456 StrongIsland Jul 1, 2016 #21 Better be less than 6. Otherwise not bringing back Okposo was stupid.
ChiHawks10 Registered User Jul 7, 2009 28,135 21,504 Chicago 'Burbs Jul 1, 2016 #23 Term on deals this year is out of control...