Celtic Note
Living the dream
- Dec 22, 2006
- 16,970
- 5,765
4 good players. What would you do instead? Please be specific.
I'm thinking based on this we might have our group set on defense....
LOL…he’s full of shit. Scandella is gone.
If he was gone, he'd already be gone. Why would Armstrong wait until 2 hours+ into free agency? Moving him obviously cost more than Armstrong was willing to pay. We may dump him at the deadline, but the chances of him being a Blue when the season starts are good.
Because there would be other teams that miss out on their target depth defensemen in UFA.
When they do, they would be looking in the cheap trade route to fill that gap.
Because there would be other teams that miss out on their target depth defensemen in UFA.
When they do, they would be looking in the cheap trade route to fill that gap.
How far down the list would you have to go before you take on a mediocre 3rd pairing, best use 7th defensemen who is making over 3 million a season for the next 2 seasons though? I can't imagine his value isn't negative at this point, and Army has never made a "trade extra resources to get rid of a negative value contract" at any point as a GM.
How are you only Neutral on Faulk? He has been very good for the past two year and is only making 6,5 per. Sorry, I don't see that.Cheap as can be expected, so that is good. I still despise this deal.
I officially dislike 1/3 of our D. If Perunovich gets a full time spot, it will be half. I am pretty much neutral on Faulk. I only like Bortz and Parry. Uggh. That's tough as I cheer for a team because of the players, not the crest.
I've just never been a fan. A good friend lives in Carolina, so I've always followed them as well. Never liked him there, and never really liked him here. It's not all on-ice stuff either. Something just rubs me wrong. Not anything big, like the Kanes, where I would hate him. I just don't jive with his style, on or off the ice.How are you only Neutral on Faulk? He has been very good for the past two year and is only making 6,5 per. Sorry, I don't see that.
Leddy is decent. He was very solid for Parry and moved the puck well. This team with a healthy Krug and JB may have given the Aves a run for their money. That is all I am asking for as a fan. Right now, our D is better than it was at this time last year.
What you’re wondering is what I’m hoping because I’m fairly whelmed with this top-4 as is.
It’s far from bad. But it lacks something more that I think the team desperately needs. What that more is could be a lot of different things depending on how Armstrong envisions the defense to operate. But right now, I still want more.
Whose out there targeting over-paid aging 3rd pairing defensemen? "Damn, there are no more $3M+ 32+ year old 3rd pairing guys. I better give assets for that guy St. Louis is desperate to dump."
How far down the list would you have to go before you take on a mediocre 3rd pairing, best use 7th defensemen who is making over 3 million a season for the next 2 seasons though? I can't imagine his value isn't negative at this point, and Army has never made a "trade extra resources to get rid of a negative value contract" at any point as a GM.
Whose out there targeting over-paid aging 3rd pairing defensemen? "Damn, there are no more $3M+ 32+ year old 3rd pairing guys. I better give assets for that guy St. Louis is desperate to dump."
I think fans are all wanting a Provo or Chech type dman. Which is fine, until you take into the account the assets that need to go back. With Thomas at 8, Kyrou around that, and likely ROR looking at that, we NEED ELC. Nieghbors, Bolduc, and Stu are all huge pieces to extending our cup window the the next 2-3 years.
With a Cap, No TEAM will not have holes in their line up. I really think fans are forgetting about not having Krug healthy in the playoffs. Prunovich helped replace the offense, but Krug is much better in the D zone and has a great pairing with Faulk.