whats the rationale with adding a 3-4th liner? We have more then enough guys to fill those roles. It would make no sense to add simply to add. Unless its a 1y deal and we can flip him at the deadline for more assets.Yes, he should. I don't know what this fascination with not trying to improve your team is. You don't go after crazy long term deals or whatever, but to completely spurn adding any player ever for some "rebuilding" philosophy is crazy.
I long for the day when all 3 are no longer on the roster. Kronwall should have been forced out last year, due to his knees, and Ericsson has been the second coming of Lilja from the very start.I was hoping and still hope that at least one of Ericsson or Daley is dealt before the season begins, and especially if Kronwall has to come back.
Gardiner is 29 on July 4th.I can see Yzerman going after Gardiner. It's pretty clear building up the D is a priority. Draper mentioned they're hoping Hronek, Seider, and Tuomisto will lock down the right side for a long time. Gardiner's 28 so if they bring him in on a 5-7 year deal, they'll have him until he's 33-35, which seems like a good fit timing-wise for where the Wings are in their rebuild. DeKeyser is signed through age 32. Then you have Cholowski or McIsaac take the third LD spot.
I wonder if Toronto would be intersted in Daley.
Please noFor what its worth, in Austrian newspaper it is reported that Vanek and Detroit are in talks for another year
Wish we traded for this guy he is awesome.
The D signed past this year are DeKeyser, Cholowski, Hronek, McIsaac, Lindstrom, McIlrath, and Lashoff. Bowey, Kaski, and Saarijarvi will be RFAs. Seider is at the very least a year away from the NHL. Plus, lots of the vets they have now already have injury problems. Is Green even going to be able to play?
They're going to need to add some vets at some point, hopefully guys on the younger side. I think Gardiner would be a good fit.
Yep Gardiner is going to get paaaaaaid. Probably over 7 long term maybe even 8aav.Gardiner is going to be overpaid given the supply market for defense this free agency. And then to decide to come to a bottom five team early in it's rebuild means we're paying a lot more as if our offer was close he'd sign with the contender/better team.
What other teams need to trade players to open up cap space? Gimme a 2020 FRP for that bad contract. I'd have been all over that Marleau deal if Toronto had offered it to us first.
If that's what it will take then I take back my comment on getting him.Yep Gardiner is going to get paaaaaaid. Probably over 7 long term maybe even 8aav.
You wouldn't give up Lindstrom and Kivenmaki + 2 2nds for a Norris winner who just cracked 30?I'd rather not give up assets for a dude with a bad back entering his 30s.
whats the rationale with adding a 3-4th liner? We have more then enough guys to fill those roles. It would make no sense to add simply to add. Unless its a 1y deal and we can flip him at the deadline for more assets.
As much as people dont want to think it, we're still in the "rebuild/retool" years. NJ is going to be better. NYR will be better. those are two who were out of it last year that should be better.
its going to be tough to get into the show in April.
Im not saying bluntly tank, but play the kids, let them learn so that when we're ready, this was all worth the wait.
you arent going to win with Nielsen deals, and IMO you wont win paying someone like Hayes 6m either. just silly contracts.
Yep Gardiner is going to get paaaaaaid. Probably over 7 long term maybe even 8aav.
Forward Kevin Hayes just got 7M with a career high of 49 points. Dman Gardiner's career high? 52 points.That's a little extreme and he doesn't compare to any of the guys in that range
If he gets over $7M AAV I think every player in the league will fire their agent and hire his
~$6.0-high 6M range I can see some desperate GM doing
But who knows we've seen some really bad/ dumb signings in the past few years on July 1, you might be right
whats the rationale with adding a 3-4th liner? We have more then enough guys to fill those roles. It would make no sense to add simply to add. Unless its a 1y deal and we can flip him at the deadline for more assets.
As much as people dont want to think it, we're still in the "rebuild/retool" years. NJ is going to be better. NYR will be better. those are two who were out of it last year that should be better.
its going to be tough to get into the show in April.
Im not saying bluntly tank, but play the kids, let them learn so that when we're ready, this was all worth the wait.
you arent going to win with Nielsen deals, and IMO you wont win paying someone like Hayes 6m either. just silly contracts.
Forward Kevin Hayes just got 7M with a career high of 49 points. Dman Gardiner's career high? 52 points.
Comparisons are out the window *. Look at the signings last year and this year. The players and agents are sniffing a big cap increase after the new television deal and they aren't wrong or the gms wouldn't be handing out big deals. 8m might be a tad extreme but i bet he fetches atleast 7.That's a little extreme and he doesn't compare to any of the guys in that range
If he gets over $7M AAV I think every player in the league will fire their agent and hire his
~$6.0-high 6M range I can see some desperate GM doing
But who knows we've seen some really bad/ dumb signings in the past few years on July 1, you might be right
No interest in Gardiner at this point. I like him but given his age it's not the right time for him. I think next offseason I would feel more comfortable with a Gardiner like signing.
Forward Kevin Hayes just got 7M with a career high of 49 points. Dman Gardiner's career high? 52 points.
I thought about this earlier today. Trading Franzen’s contract to COL would make some sense. COL would get 3,9 M in cap for the price of 1M, getting closer to the cap floor.Can we even put him on LTIR? Zetterberg and Franzen are already using up what we have. I thought there was a limit to how much money can be used?
No because his deal is up in 3 years and we aren't competing in that window. Then you're faced with a 33ish year old with a bad back wanting big money you either pay because you don't want to waste what you trade for him or let him walk and didn't get any real value. There's a reason he went so cheap.You wouldn't give up Lindstrom and Kivenmaki + 2 2nds for a Norris winner who just cracked 30?
If I get a chance at a high end piece for 4 assets who are all unlikely to make an impact at the NHL level I do it all day every day.
I thought about this earlier today. Trading Franzen’s contract to COL would make some sense. COL would get 3,9 M in cap for the price of 1M, getting closer to the cap floor.