News Article: News and Notes XXIV - ZOMG The Athletic Carolinas Incoming

Status
Not open for further replies.

cptjeff

Reprehensible User
Sep 18, 2008
20,700
35,268
Washington, DC.
Wasn't there that legal case brewing just over that? I vaguely remember doing a gdt.

edit: https://hfboards.mandatory.com/threads/whalers-trademark-lawsuit-law-order-sound.2442553/

https://hfboards.mandatory.com/thre...-nhl-vs-jay-kennette-media-group-llc.2442565/

As of April 6th, 2018 looks like Jay Kennette abandoned their attempted registration oof the trademark as the result of Carolina Hurricanes opposition to it:

Trademark Status & Document Retrieval

"Abandoned after an inter partes decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. For further information, see TTABVUE on the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board web page"

USPTO TTABVUE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Inquiry System

I don't think just anyone can sell HW merch, Hurricanes has a legit claim to the IP the very least.


Somebody other than the NHL trying to register the trademark is very different from selling something with a design that is no longer under trademark protection. My understanding is that you can sell something Whalers related, you just can't try to claim that that's your exclusive IP.
 

Lempo

Recovering Future Considerations Truther
Sponsor
Feb 23, 2014
26,887
83,840
Somebody other than the NHL trying to register the trademark is very different from selling something with a design that is no longer under trademark protection. My understanding is that you can sell something Whalers related, you just can't try to claim that that's your exclusive IP.

Tarheel put Hank's excellent trademark check-ups in the first link I posted. Hurricanes Hockey LP owns the trademark for the HW logo. The wordmark "Hartford Whalers" apparently is not as conclusively registered.

If you tried selling stuff with the real deal whaletail logo, Hurricanes Hockey LP would cease&desist your ass in hasty order.

If you tried selling stuff with "Hartword Whalers" sillily written on it, NHL/HHLP probably would still try and claim that they have done established use on the wordmark and that you're infringing them on that basis. The lack of registration as such to my understanding is not a proof that a trademark is free-for-all. Obviously there's more hurdles when you're trying to react to it legally.
 

vorbis

bunch of likes
Feb 9, 2013
2,533
13,328
YTZ

Lempo

Recovering Future Considerations Truther
Sponsor
Feb 23, 2014
26,887
83,840
But in this case placed correctly.

Unless she was saying it's the Canes, not the fans, who are passionate.
Carolina Hurricanes' fans = fans of Carolina Hurricanes. Sounds correct enough for me, though obviously of-genetive would be better.

Assumably she means passionate fans of Carolina Hurricanes, and not fans of passionate Carolina Hurricanes. The opening paragraphs suggest the former: "What our fanbase lacks in size we make up for in passion.”

Though apparently it is the placing of the adjective attribute that you got a problem with?
 
Last edited:

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,291
138,842
Bojangles Parking Lot
Carolina Hurricanes' fans = fans of Carolina Hurricanes. Sounds correct enough for me, though obviously of-genetive would be better.

the passionate Carolina Hurricanes fans = passionate fans of the Carolina Hurricanes
the passionate Carolina Hurricanes' fans = fans of the passionate Carolina Hurricanes

I mean, it's not necessarily wrong. This is a team that's signed Tlusty, Semin, Aho, Darling in the past decade. They seem a little thirsty, if you know what I mean. *wink wink*
 

Lempo

Recovering Future Considerations Truther
Sponsor
Feb 23, 2014
26,887
83,840
We need to Harriet Johnson her immediately for her own benefit before her faulty usage of grammatical modifiers settles!

Who's going to write her our protestation under the title of "Of writers and of-genetives"?

What we really need is a joint F=26 twitter account.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad