Proposal: MTL & DUCKS

Status
Not open for further replies.

MMC

Global Moderator
May 11, 2014
48,407
39,382
Orange County, CA
IMG_1953.jpeg
 

Lockin17

Registered User
Jul 31, 2018
3,284
2,379
Zegras isn't worth Guhle, and the benefits of dumping Armia isn't worth the discrepancy in value. Guhle is our number one D right now.
We got Matheson - Struble - WIFI - Hutson - Engstrom - Harris

we can spare Ghule for a top 6
 
Last edited:

lwvs84

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
4,115
2,808
Los Angeles, CA
We got Matheson - Struble - WIFI - Hutson - Engstrom - Harris

we can spare Ghule for a top 6 RW
Not counting value or Ducks needs, Zegras is a LW/C. I don't think he's played much (or any) RW at any high level. I think he was LW in WJC, C in college, and swaps between those two in the NHL. He could probably manage, but he's looked better as a C than a wing.
 

EveryDay

Registered User
Jun 13, 2009
13,216
5,310
You should ask yourself this question first. Does Anaheim need a LD on their top4? I'll help you, the answer is no.

They have Fowler, Minty, Zellweger, Lacombe.

The offer is bad, even for MTL, I see no reason to trade our best defenceman for Zegras.

I would like a trade with Anaheim but I don't believe they would love adding futures right now.
 
Last edited:

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
40,505
36,006
Guhle isn’t moving anywhere and I doubt the Ducks would need another LHD.
Basically this
LHD is by far our least need position.

And zegras in theory fills our most needed position. Wouldn’t make sense for Anaheim.

If we move zegras I feel like it would be for a similar age player with similar upside, by different stylistically from zegras…. Or at the draft for a highish pick +
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad