joshjull
Registered User
What I'm saying is that this Moulson/Murray issue with Moulson's questionable workout has already been squashed. Murray said they talked to the Moulson. In my eyes, this is a nonissue to me. There was zero reason why this article had to be written.
Sure they talked to Murray and told them what he did. But did the article really need to be written? It's not as of this is taking place now. It took place in the past. Why write about something that happened a little bit ago and already taken care of?
Instead, readers will be talking about this happening now.
You obviously didn't pay attention to how this happened. Murray brought up all the stuff about Moulson on WGR before Thursday's game when on with Schopp/Bulldog. The follow ups were the next day by Vogl and others. Frankly you sound ridiculous complaining that a article was written based on our GM publicly calling out one of our players the day after he publicly called out said player for not putting the work in.