I know Koivu isn't playingNHL but he is able too but just hasn't had the chance with the wild... and ruutu is a good player but i woulk dlike ur opionions on these guys and who is better.. thanks..
VanIslander said:Mikko.
Imagine a physically strong Saku with more defensive skill.
BTW, the only reason Mikko isn't the top centre in Minnesota is his injury. He's pegged as top dog when he returns, though Chouinard sure is making a case for pushing Mikko to the second line.
Absolutely, but the Wild management has gone on the record saying he will be the team's #1 when he returns... it's not like there's a bona fide first line centre he'd be pushing out of the position, so the statement isn't exactly earth shattering.DoobieDoobieDo said:Koivu is a second line center.
DoobieDoobieDo said:Koivu is a second line center that is kind of slow. He's stronger than Saku but he's slower...
He has a problem with injuries...It's more bad luck than...chronic.
VanIslander said:Mikko.
Imagine a physically strong Saku with more defensive skill.
BTW, the only reason Mikko isn't the top centre in Minnesota is his injury. He's pegged as top dog when he returns, though Chouinard sure is making a case for pushing Mikko to the second line.
Bookman said:Ruutu has also had his share of injuries, and the type that could be more serious over time, i.e. knee.
Garp said:Rutuu easily for me
and BTW, there is almost nothing similar in Saku and Mikko's game.