McKenzie on Expansion: Vegas and possibly beyond 32?

Mightygoose

Registered User
Nov 5, 2012
5,616
1,443
Ajax, ON
Latest on expansion from Bob McKenzie via Insider's trading.

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=439258

Q: What the latest on NHL expansion? Where and when?

McKenzie: The NHL party line hasn't changed. There are no formal plans for expansion but if they expand and everyone assumes at some point, they're going to, the common knowledge is that Seattle is the primary target in the Pacific Northwest. The strong sense I'm getting now is that Las Vegas is second on that *list behind Seattle and the NHL wants to be the first major professional sports league to put a franchise in Las Vegas. People in Quebec City may be saying, 'Hey, what about us?' Well, keep in mind, there's not rule that says if they expand, that they only expand by two teams. The possibility of expanding by three teams, with Quebec City being one of them, is at least something that will be considered. There's lots of money in expansion; over $300 million per franchise, close to a $1 billion winfall that isn't shared with the players or anyone else, just the owners.

Or perhaps more and staggered over multiple years? Bettman is listening so perhaps he's seeing how many are taking.

*So there is a list :sarcasm:
 
Last edited:

Tackla

Registered User
Jul 2, 2013
413
0
Viva Las Vegas

Starting a thread because I didn't see one and Bob McKenzie alluded to an NHL expansion team being a real possibility in Las Vegas on TSN tonight, and if the TSN Hockey Insider says it, it must be true?

Does anyone feel that with weather similar to that of Phoenix, but with even more entertainment competition, plus gambling everywhere, Las Vegas would be a good spot for an NHL hockey team? Discuss the Las Vegas franchise here.
 

gstommylee

Registered User
Jan 31, 2012
14,500
2,790
Starting a thread because I didn't see one and Bob McKenzie alluded to an NHL expansion team being a real possibility in Las Vegas on TSN tonight, and if the TSN Hockey Insider says it, it must be true?

Does anyone feel that with weather similar to that of Phoenix, but with even more entertainment competition, plus gambling everywhere, Las Vegas would be a good spot for an NHL hockey team? Discuss the Las Vegas franchise here.

Vegas as i said is a high risk high reward. It could work out great for NHL but could also be a bust.
 

MarkGio

Registered User
Nov 6, 2010
12,533
11
33 teams is a weird set up. At least Las Vegas and Seattle even out the East and West.

Maybe they're saving Quebec for a franchise that folds.
 

gstommylee

Registered User
Jan 31, 2012
14,500
2,790

I think it might be better given there is no NHL ready arena even as a temp in Vegas that it would be Seattle/QC 2015/16 then GTA2 Vegas 2016/17 for 34 teams. This way Detroit and Columbus stays where they are at.

8/8/9/8 doesn't make sense to me. I rather see 36 than 34 teams but i see 34 better than 33.
 

Mightygoose

Registered User
Nov 5, 2012
5,616
1,443
Ajax, ON
I think it might be better given there is no NHL ready arena even as a temp in Vegas that it would be Seattle/QC 2015/16 then GTA2 Vegas 2016/17 for 34 teams. This way Detroit and Columbus stays where they are at.

8/8/9/8 doesn't make sense to me. I rather see 36 than 34 teams but i see 34 better than 33.

I agree a proposed 33 team set up cwuld look strange though the league has gone with odd numbers for 13 years.

I suspect (and could be wrong) that the league is listening and looking for a 4th city and perhaps expand over 2-3 years.
 

gstommylee

Registered User
Jan 31, 2012
14,500
2,790
Being able to say you're the first of the big4 into LV is hardly a great reward. Is it necessary to give Phx a natural rival? Maybe I'm underestimating the importance of this franchise but I don't see the upside.

Vegas had a great ecomony going before the economy tanked. If the economy can get back to what it was NHL could benefit from it.

Perhaps getting a pro franchise there could help turn things around.
 

Hammer79

Registered User
Jan 9, 2009
7,365
1,202
Kelowna
The players may not be getting these expansion fees, but they win anyway. 23 jobs per team are created, and presumably they go to under-served and likely to be healthy markets, increasing the revenue pie. Going to Vegas is a bold move, with all the gambling issues that have scared off other leagues, but it may be time to beat the other leagues to the punch here. Seattle and Vegas would bring the west to 16 teams. QC would bring the east to 17 teams, but that's not really a big deal.
 

gstommylee

Registered User
Jan 31, 2012
14,500
2,790
The players may not be getting these expansion fees, but they win anyway. 23 jobs per team are created, and presumably they go to under-served and likely to be healthy markets, increasing the revenue pie. Going to Vegas is a bold move, with all the gambling issues that have scared off other leagues, but it may be time to beat the other leagues to the punch here. Seattle and Vegas would bring the west to 16 teams. QC would bring the east to 17 teams, but that's not really a big deal.

Lack of actually facilities was another reason.
 

DyerMaker66*

Guest
33 teams is a weird set up. At least Las Vegas and Seattle even out the East and West.

Maybe they're saving Quebec for a franchise that folds.

Is 11-11-11 really that much weirder than 5-5-5/5-5-5?
 

premadonna

Registered User
Oct 5, 2012
1,212
0
European domestic leagues are going to die, the KHL is adding new teams every year and now the NHL...

Where will all the talent come from? Hockey is a tiny participant sport with a limited talent pool...
 

Big McLargehuge

Fragile Traveler
May 9, 2002
72,188
7,742
S. Pasadena, CA
11-11-11 would send Detroit/Columbus back to a western timezone.

As well as 4 long-time eastern conference teams.

33 seems weird, but the league sat at 21 for a good while, so it's not exactly unprecedented...I just don't think any sports league can handle more than 32 for simple competitive reasons. I really have no issue with holding onto Quebec as a relocation option, but expansion past 32 is just too much.

Also I'm really against a Vegas team, though it would be something that I'd personally get a kick out of...I'm the fan that the NHL is dreaming of when they envision putting a team in Vegas...the one that would totally plan a vacation to Vegas around my team playing there...but I'm also a Penguins fan living a 4 hour drive away from Vegas...so...how reasonable is it to expect that the most transient of all transient cities could hope to support a team? And that's not bringing in the other issues of putting a team in a city like that into account...but on a sure financial account, I have no doubt that they'd make an absolute killing with sponsorships.
 

Inkling

Same Old Hockey
Nov 27, 2006
5,655
679
Ottawa
Vegas strikes me as Phoenix, but much smaller. I don't see it myself but that's never stopped the NHL.
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
187,293
39,328
NHL wants to be the first league to put a team in Vegas. What they don't have: Owner. Building.
 

Acesolid

The Illusive Bettman
Sep 21, 2010
2,538
323
Québec
NHL wants to be the first league to put a team in Vegas. What they don't have: Owner. Building.

I agree, they may want to make it work. But there's nobody crazy enough to spend 300 millions+ to get an expansion NHL team in Vegas in this economy!

But who knows... maybe the Mob wants to use an NHL team to launder money. :laugh:
 

MoreOrr

B4
Jun 20, 2006
24,425
440
Mexico
Latest on expansion from Bob McKenzie via Insider's trading.

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=439258



Or perhaps more and staggered over multiple years? Bettman is listening so perhaps he's seeing how many are taking.

*So there is a list :sarcasm:

Still don't think we'll see an expansion of two PTZ teams, for the same Division, in the same Season. If two far west teams are next to come into the League by expansion, there'll likely be a year or two gap between the two teams entering the League.
 

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad