Who said he is supposed to be a better goal scorer? I'm pretty sure all I have heard from Benning is that he is a better two way player.
I posted this in Shinkaruk's first goal thread as well... ;
Another small skilled winger. You guys can have him.
What's with all the Benning hatred? He gave up on some 175 pound puck hog who can't win a board battle or play defense.
A couple points in a couple games during garbage time. Plan the parade
Baertschi made Shinkaruk expendable, we had to move on, the deal was made. Get over it. Calgary wants to try to win 4 playoff rounds with their top two LW's combing for a weight of 340 pounds? Be my guest, good luck with that.
Yeah cuz what this team needs are definitely more bottom 6 players. Or should i say, more unproven bottom 6 players, since Granlund isn't really much more proven than Shinkaruk. He was drafted 2 years earlier than Shinkaruk and Shinkaruk missed a whole year because of an injury.
It's not like we're the worst team in the league in goals scored right now. It's not like we needed a winger that can score and put up points more than we needed a bottom 6 player. Our top6 is GREAT!
Shinkaruk was NEVER given a fair shot in the NHL, even though we've been struggling with scoring goals for months. ONE single player on our team made him expandable? OK!
As far as value goes, Shinkaruk was one of our most valuable prospects, and we gave him up for a guy with a ****ing bottom 6 ceiling. It truly is mind boggling, if you're gonna trade a guy like that, at least trade him for something we actually NEED, like say a defenceman that Benning has been talking about for 2 years. Benning hasn't won a single trade as far as giving up less value for more, that would be the Etem trade if any, too bad that he's also struggling with putting up points. People will mention the Baertschi trade, and honestly, i like that one myself and always did. But fact is, no other GM were willing to give up a 2nd for Baertschi, Benning was the only one who would. So take that for what it's worth.